Hi,
I had to map a rbd from an ubuntu Trusty luminous client on an octopus cluster.
client dmesg :
feature set mismatch, my 4a042a42 < server's 100004a042a42, missing 1000000000000
I downgrade my osd tunable to bobtail but it still doesn't work
ceph osd crush show-tunables
{
"choose_local_tries": 0,
"choose_local_fallback_tries": 0,
"choose_total_tries": 50,
"chooseleaf_descend_once": 1,
"chooseleaf_vary_r": 0,
"chooseleaf_stable": 0,
"straw_calc_version": 1,
"allowed_bucket_algs": 22,
"profile": "bobtail",
"optimal_tunables": 0,
"legacy_tunables": 0,
"minimum_required_version": "hammer",
"require_feature_tunables": 1,
"require_feature_tunables2": 1,
"has_v2_rules": 0,
"require_feature_tunables3": 0,
"has_v3_rules": 0,
"has_v4_buckets": 1,
"require_feature_tunables5": 0,
"has_v5_rules": 0
}
Thanks for your help.
Marc
Hello.
I'm using the Nautilus Ceph version for some huge folder with approximately 1.7TB of files.I created the filesystem and started to copy files via rsync.
However, I've had to stop the process, because Ceph shows me that the new size of the folder is almost 6TB. I double checked the replicated size and it is 2. I double checked the rsync options and I didn't copy the files followed by symlinks.
How would it be possible to explain the extreme difference between the size of the original folder and CephFS?
Hi everyone,
We are in the process of migrating from docs.ceph.com to
ceph.readthedocs.io. We enabled it in
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/34499 and will now be using it by
default.
Why?
- The search feature in ceph.readthedocs.io is much better than
docs.ceph.com and allows you to search multiple strings.
- RTD provides an in-built version switching feature which we plan to
use in future.
What does it mean to you?
- Some broken links are expected during this migration. Things like
ceph API documentation need special handling (example:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/api/) and are expected to be
broken temporarily.
- Much better Ceph documentation experience once the migration is done.
Thanks for your patience!
Cheers,
Neha
Every so often there might be a mistake in the inbox and that may dishearten you to see the sends. Considering, you can take a stab at bracing the page. On the off chance that that doesn't work, by then you can find maintain from the client care pack by dialing the Facebook Customer Service Toll Free Number and keeping an eye on the rep or you can cycle to take help from the tech help regions. https://www.customercare-email.com/facebook-customer-service.html
Sometimes the printhead issue can be a problem and result in Epson Error Code 0x97. Therefore, there can be problems from time to time and that will cause an issue. To deal with the error, you can take assistance from the tech videos or consultancies. In addition to that, you can also reach customer care for help. https://www.epsonprintersupportpro.net/epson-error-code-0x97/
Hi all,
we are setting up a SAMBA share and would like to use the vfs_ceph module. Unfortunately, it seems not to be part of the common SAMBA packages on CentOS 8. Does anyone know how to install vfs_ceph? The SAMBA version on CentOS 8 is samba-4.11.2-13 and the documentation says the module is part of it.
Thanks and best regards,
=================
Frank Schilder
AIT Risø Campus
Bygning 109, rum S14
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM Marc Roos <M.Roos(a)f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> - In the future you will not be able to read the docs if you have an
> adblocker(?)
not aware of anything of this sort
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> To: dev; ceph-users
> Cc: Kefu Chai
> Subject: [ceph-users] Migration to ceph.readthedocs.io underway
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We are in the process of migrating from docs.ceph.com to
> ceph.readthedocs.io. We enabled it in
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/34499 and will now be using it by
> default.
>
> Why?
>
> - The search feature in ceph.readthedocs.io is much better than
> docs.ceph.com and allows you to search multiple strings.
> - RTD provides an in-built version switching feature which we plan to
> use in future.
>
> What does it mean to you?
>
> - Some broken links are expected during this migration. Things like ceph
> API documentation need special handling (example:
> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/api/) and are expected to be
> broken temporarily.
>
> - Much better Ceph documentation experience once the migration is done.
>
> Thanks for your patience!
>
> Cheers,
> Neha
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io To unsubscribe send an
> email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io
>
>
I wonder if this new system allows me to choose Ceph versions. I see the
v:latest in the right bottom corner but it seems to be the only choice so
far.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:31 PM Marc Roos <M.Roos(a)f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:
>
>
> - In the future you will not be able to read the docs if you have an
> adblocker(?)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> To: dev; ceph-users
> Cc: Kefu Chai
> Subject: [ceph-users] Migration to ceph.readthedocs.io underway
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We are in the process of migrating from docs.ceph.com to
> ceph.readthedocs.io. We enabled it in
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/34499 and will now be using it by
> default.
>
> Why?
>
> - The search feature in ceph.readthedocs.io is much better than
> docs.ceph.com and allows you to search multiple strings.
> - RTD provides an in-built version switching feature which we plan to
> use in future.
>
> What does it mean to you?
>
> - Some broken links are expected during this migration. Things like ceph
> API documentation need special handling (example:
> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/api/) and are expected to be
> broken temporarily.
>
> - Much better Ceph documentation experience once the migration is done.
>
> Thanks for your patience!
>
> Cheers,
> Neha
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io To unsubscribe send an
> email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io
>
This is the fifth backport release of the Ceph Octopus stable release
series. This release brings a range of fixes across all components. We
recommend that all Octopus users upgrade to this release.
Notable Changes
---------------
* CephFS: Automatic static subtree partitioning policies may now be configured
using the new distributed and random ephemeral pinning extended attributes on
directories. See the documentation for more information:
https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/multimds/
* Monitors now have a config option `mon_osd_warn_num_repaired`, 10 by default.
If any OSD has repaired more than this many I/O errors in stored data a
`OSD_TOO_MANY_REPAIRS` health warning is generated.
* Now when noscrub and/or no deep-scrub flags are set globally or per pool,
scheduled scrubs of the type disabled will be aborted. All user initiated
scrubs are NOT interrupted.
* Fix an issue with osdmaps not being trimmed in a healthy cluster (
issue#47297, pr#36981)
For the detailed changelog please refer to the blog entry at
https://ceph.io/releases/v15-2-5-octopus-released/
Getting Ceph
------------
* Git at git://github.com/ceph/ceph.git
* Tarball at http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ceph-15.2.5.tar.gz
* For packages, see http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/get-packages/
* Release git sha1: 2c93eff00150f0cc5f106a559557a58d3d7b6f1f
--
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)