2 Oct
2019
2 Oct
'19
3:56 p.m.
I need to upgrade our Red Hat Satellite server in order to get RHEL8
fully working in the lab. I'll need to take an outage to do so.
I wanted to get dev input on whether I should pause the smithi queue for
the duration or just let RHEL jobs fail. I would hope the outage
wouldn't last more than a couple hours.
--
David Galloway
Systems Administrator, RDU
Ceph Engineering
IRC: dgalloway
2 Oct
2 Oct
4:16 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 6:13 AM David Galloway <dgallowa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I need to upgrade our Red Hat Satellite server in order to get RHEL8
fully working in the lab. I'll need to take an outage to do so.
I wanted to get dev input on whether I should pause the smithi queue for
the duration or just let RHEL jobs fail. I would hope the outage
wouldn't last more than a couple hours.
Rerunning failed RHEL jobs is less disruptive than pausing the queue
IMHO. Also vote for doing this on a weekday (not Friday) so it doesn't
disrupt over-the-weekend integration tests.
--
Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D.
He / Him / His
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA
GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D
4:30 p.m.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, David Galloway wrote:
I need to upgrade our Red Hat Satellite server in
order to get RHEL8
fully working in the lab. I'll need to take an outage to do so.
I wanted to get dev input on whether I should pause the smithi queue for
the duration or just let RHEL jobs fail. I would hope the outage
wouldn't last more than a couple hours.
I'd say whatever gets it done most quickly. Right now the queue doesn't
have any dev scheduled job except one of mine, which I can reschedule.
Pause the queue and get it done?
sage
1672
days inactive
1672
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
David Galloway -
Patrick Donnelly -
Sage Weil