On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:16 AM David Galloway <dgallowa@redhat.com> wrote:
On 2/19/20 5:28 PM, Brad Hubbard wrote:
My vote would be for fedora (kept on a supported release). I don't see why we, as Red Hat, would want to run Ubuntu (if we *need* Ubuntu then we should be pulling Ubuntu containers). I see these machines really as just a platform for setting up containers and therefore I just want a modern podman or, if you insist, docker. Happy to be informed/corrected as always and am not passionate about defending my choice :)
The upstream Ceph community is more than just Red Hat. We build and
Oh, I didn't realise these machines were going to be available to the upstream Ceph community, fair enough then.
publish packages for Ubuntu so naturally it's used as a dev environment.
Are you suggesting this can't be done in containers?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:43 AM Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:55 AM David Galloway <dgallowa@redhat.com> wrote:
Hey all,
The rex replacements (named vossi) are almost ready. There are 6 of them. What operating system(s) would you all like installed on them? Half CentOS 8 and half Bionic?
I think we’ve had issues with old packages on CentOS in the past that made doing dev builds annoying — I’m not sure if that’s a reason to make sure we have it in the dev pool or to avoid it and do regularly-upgraded Fedora instead... I'd prefer CentOS 8 as a stable environment. I've found developers often waste time on debugging Fedora packaging issues. We don't
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:59 AM Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com> wrote: package for Fedora so it should not be considered.
Is there a reason not to use RHEL8 instead of CentOS?
No, not particularly. So I'm hearing maybe 1 Bionic, 1 Fedora, 4 RHEL8? _______________________________________________ Sepia mailing list -- sepia@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to sepia-leave@ceph.io
-- Cheers, Brad