29 Mar
2021
29 Mar
'21
3:04 p.m.
If 16.2.0 is as close as Sage says it is, I'm not sure a 16.1.1 is really worth doing at this point. And I was assured some time back that the tag will not move. On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:30 AM Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 2:55 PM Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> wrote:
This was just a bit of a mix-up because of the above. When David did the pacific build off of the branch tip last week he used 16.1.0 because he didn't realize that tag already existed, and for an rc it didn't seem worth repeating the build.
For the record, users should not expect the https://github.com/ceph/ceph/releases/tag/v16.1.0 to move, right?
It would be nice to release v16.1.1 to clear this up.
- Ken