If 16.2.0 is as close as Sage says it is, I'm not sure a 16.1.1 is really worth doing at this point.

And I was assured some time back that the tag will not move.

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:30 AM Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 2:55 PM Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> wrote:
> This was just a bit of a mix-up because of the above. When David did
> the pacific build off of the branch tip last week he used 16.1.0
> because he didn't realize that tag already existed, and for an rc it
> didn't seem worth repeating the build.

For the record, users should not expect the
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/releases/tag/v16.1.0 to move, right?

It would be nice to release v16.1.1 to clear this up.

- Ken