We are continuing on this release. In the tracker https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906 please see runs with the comment "on Build 5". This build and runs were done after the lab move. Seeking approvals for: smoke - FAILED, was reviewed and approved by Laura and Patrick, see Slack thread for details rados - FAILED, Afreen, Travis, Laura, Radek approved? rgw - FAILED, Adam E approved? rbd, krbd - FAILED, Ilya approved? fs - FAILED, Venky approved? orch - FAILED, Adam K approved? upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - FAILED Laura, approved? upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - FAILED Laura, approved? upgrade/reef-p2p - FAILED Laura, approved? powercycle - FAILED Brad, approved? ceph-volume - Approved Guillaume? Patrick was reviewing some tests, please see his comments in the same tracker. TIA On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 1:19 AM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users < ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:31 PM Yuri Weinstein via Dev <dev@ceph.io> wrote:
This test branch was built loner then 2.5 weeks ago I have to rebuild it first and then will schedule krbd
krbd approved based on
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-10_21:26:56-krbd-reef-release-testing...
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-12_18:20:32-krbd-reef-release-testing...
Thanks,
Ilya
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:39 PM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users <
ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:50 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 5:00 PM Venky Shankar via ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
Hi Yuri,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:34 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>
wrote:
Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point
release
Details of this release are summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - N/A
distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm
Seeking approvals/reviews for:
smoke - Laura approved?
rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King
approved?
(rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request)
rgw - Adam E approved?
fs - Venky approved?
There are lot many failures in the fs suite resembling
Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs type, bad option ...
which is an issue with the testing kernel. Adding Alex who was looking into this issue.
As far as the run validation is concerned, it's risky to ignore the large number of failures. We have two options:
- fix the testing kernel issue and rerun - rerun with `for-linus` branch (with `-k for-linus` in the teuthology-suite schedule command)
The latter would be using an older kernel branch, but I think it should suffice for this case.
Hi Venky,
With your report of the fs suite being affected as well, I carved out some time to take a look.
I think it's happening because XFS maintainers disabled support for V4 filesystems that was deprecated 5 years ago -- as of 6.18 kernel it's no longer compiled in by default. The proper fix would be to create an image with/move to V5 on-disk format; I have opened [1] to try to achieve that. We can also re-enable V4 on-disk format in our kernel builds as a workaround.
This should be fixed now. Yuri, please schedule a rerun for krbd.
Thanks,
Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io