On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:31 PM Yuri Weinstein via Dev <dev@ceph.io> wrote:
>
> This test branch was built loner then 2.5 weeks ago
> I have to rebuild it first and then will schedule krbd

krbd approved based on

https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-10_21:26:56-krbd-reef-release-testing-default-smithi/
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-12_18:20:32-krbd-reef-release-testing-default-smithi/

Thanks,

                Ilya

>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:39 PM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:50 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 5:00 PM Venky Shankar via ceph-users
>> > <ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Yuri,
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:34 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Note:  this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point release
>> > > >
>> > > > Details of this release are summarized here:
>> > > >
>> > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1
>> > > > Release Notes - TBD
>> > > > LRC upgrade - N/A
>> > > >
>> > > > distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm
>> > > >
>> > > > Seeking approvals/reviews for:
>> > > >
>> > > > smoke - Laura approved?
>> > > >
>> > > > rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis?  Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?
>> > > > (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 +
>> > > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request)
>> > > >
>> > > > rgw - Adam E approved?
>> > > >
>> > > > fs - Venky approved?
>> > >
>> > > There are lot many failures in the fs suite resembling
>> > >
>> > >         Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs
>> > > type, bad option ...
>> > >
>> > > which is an issue with the testing kernel. Adding Alex who was looking
>> > > into this issue.
>> > >
>> > > As far as the run validation is concerned, it's risky to ignore the
>> > > large number of failures. We have two options:
>> > >
>> > > - fix the testing kernel issue and rerun
>> > > - rerun with `for-linus` branch (with `-k for-linus` in the
>> > > teuthology-suite schedule command)
>> > >
>> > > The latter would be using an older kernel branch, but I think it
>> > > should suffice for this case.
>> >
>> > Hi Venky,
>> >
>> > With your report of the fs suite being affected as well, I carved out
>> > some time to take a look.
>> >
>> > I think it's happening because XFS maintainers disabled support for V4
>> > filesystems that was deprecated 5 years ago -- as of 6.18 kernel it's
>> > no longer compiled in by default.  The proper fix would be to create an
>> > image with/move to V5 on-disk format; I have opened [1] to try to
>> > achieve that.  We can also re-enable V4 on-disk format in our kernel
>> > builds as a workaround.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/799
>>
>> This should be fixed now.  Yuri, please schedule a rerun for krbd.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>                 Ilya
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io