Thanks for pushing the branch on my behalf, it built OK[0] and I made some changes. Would
you be so kind as to force-push the newer version[1]?
[0]
Hi Nathan,
I drafted a c2c standalone teuthology test[0]. Would you be so kind as to push it to
GitHub on my behalf so that it builds the corresponding packages? I'm sorry to bother
you with this but I don't know if there is another way to build the packages and tell
teuthology to get them.
Cheers
[0]
https://lab.fedeproxy.eu/ceph/ceph/-/tree/wip-mempool-cacheline-49781
On 25/03/2021 14:04, Loïc Dachary wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for the comment, it makes perfect sense. I'm eager to work on it but
I'll have be patient and wait until next week.
>
> To be continued!
>
> On 25/03/2021 13:40, jmario(a)redhat.com wrote:
>> Hi Loïc:
>> One quick comment.
>>
>> Normally a script with many commands isn't needed to detect cacheline
contention. The reason I gave you one is because I know nothing about your environment,
the topology, the system, or the load you're running. The many commands in that
script should give me enough information such that I don't come back a 2nd time asking
you to rerun something because I needed more information.
>>
>> All it takes is one simple "perf c2c record ..." command to examine
cacheline contention. And my goal is to help you see it yourself.
>>
>> Let me know when you have something.
>> Thank you.
>> Joe
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
>> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io