Hi Yuri, On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:34 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point release
Details of this release are summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - N/A
distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm
Seeking approvals/reviews for:
smoke - Laura approved?
rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request)
rgw - Adam E approved?
fs - Venky approved?
There are lot many failures in the fs suite resembling Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs type, bad option ... which is an issue with the testing kernel. Adding Alex who was looking into this issue. As far as the run validation is concerned, it's risky to ignore the large number of failures. We have two options: - fix the testing kernel issue and rerun - rerun with `for-linus` branch (with `-k for-linus` in the teuthology-suite schedule command) The latter would be using an older kernel branch, but I think it should suffice for this case.
orch - Adam King approved?
rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?
upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? (same as in 18.2.5) upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look. (same as in 18.2.5)
powercycle - Brad approved? ceph-volume - see orch, Guillaume approved?
Notably upgrades suites show same results as for 18.2.5 (tested in March 2025)
To compare, see 18.2.5 tests https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 TIA _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
-- Cheers, Venky