reef 18.2.8 QE validation status
Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point release Details of this release are summarized here: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - N/A distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm Seeking approvals/reviews for: smoke - Laura approved? rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request) rgw - Adam E approved? fs - Venky approved? orch - Adam King approved? rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved? upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? (same as in 18.2.5) upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look. (same as in 18.2.5) powercycle - Brad approved? ceph-volume - see orch, Guillaume approved? Notably upgrades suites show same results as for 18.2.5 (tested in March 2025) To compare, see 18.2.5 tests https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 TIA
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 12:04 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point release
Details of this release are summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - N/A
distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm
Seeking approvals/reviews for:
smoke - Laura approved?
rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request)
rgw - Adam E approved?
fs - Venky approved?
orch - Adam King approved?
rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?
rbd approved, krbd needs a rerun as all jobs failed while going through cephlab.yml playbook (not related to RBD): ['Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/mapper/vg_nvme-lv_5, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.'] Thanks, Ilya
Rerun scheduled for krbd Still waiting for replies from dev leads On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 6:24 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 12:04 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point release
Details of this release are summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - N/A
distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm
Seeking approvals/reviews for:
smoke - Laura approved?
rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request)
rgw - Adam E approved?
fs - Venky approved?
orch - Adam King approved?
rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?
rbd approved, krbd needs a rerun as all jobs failed while going through cephlab.yml playbook (not related to RBD):
['Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/mapper/vg_nvme-lv_5, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.']
Thanks,
Ilya
On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 6:08 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
Rerun scheduled for krbd
It's still the same. I'd suggest keeping an eye on the run before "admitting" it for a possible approval -- something that is completely red with not a single job reaching the point where the actual test starts clearly can't be approved. Thanks, Ilya
Hi Yuri, On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:34 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point release
Details of this release are summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - N/A
distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm
Seeking approvals/reviews for:
smoke - Laura approved?
rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request)
rgw - Adam E approved?
fs - Venky approved?
There are lot many failures in the fs suite resembling Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs type, bad option ... which is an issue with the testing kernel. Adding Alex who was looking into this issue. As far as the run validation is concerned, it's risky to ignore the large number of failures. We have two options: - fix the testing kernel issue and rerun - rerun with `for-linus` branch (with `-k for-linus` in the teuthology-suite schedule command) The latter would be using an older kernel branch, but I think it should suffice for this case.
orch - Adam King approved?
rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?
upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? (same as in 18.2.5) upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look. (same as in 18.2.5)
powercycle - Brad approved? ceph-volume - see orch, Guillaume approved?
Notably upgrades suites show same results as for 18.2.5 (tested in March 2025)
To compare, see 18.2.5 tests https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 TIA _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
-- Cheers, Venky
Hi Yuri, ceph-volume approved. Thanks! -- Guillaume Abrioux Software Engineer From: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> Date: Friday, 21 November 2025 at 00:04 To: dev <dev@ceph.io>, ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] reef 18.2.8 QE validation status Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef point release Details of this release are summarized here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_73906-23note-2D1&d=DwICAg&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=TcRZ9_P9N_0sJfWD6_JqBG3n8vOtSgr6wwS-clmjNsmfnIDrocDl8vq5hezz8Z2O&s=HG7lwkOY-JwQJajDmAflvz9G1GCK1OT_MuXj5D6KEHU&e= Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - N/A distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm Seeking approvals/reviews for: smoke - Laura approved? rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ceph_ceph_pull_66056&d=DwICAg&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=TcRZ9_P9N_0sJfWD6_JqBG3n8vOtSgr6wwS-clmjNsmfnIDrocDl8vq5hezz8Z2O&s=lsasA4FKHaizA-vwBfTqklEicoWyRURhKRdTtvngWGE&e= per Igor's request) rgw - Adam E approved? fs - Venky approved? orch - Adam King approved? rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved? upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? (same as in 18.2.5) upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look. (same as in 18.2.5) powercycle - Brad approved? ceph-volume - see orch, Guillaume approved? Notably upgrades suites show same results as for 18.2.5 (tested in March 2025) To compare, see 18.2.5 tests https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_70563-23note-2D1&d=DwICAg&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=TcRZ9_P9N_0sJfWD6_JqBG3n8vOtSgr6wwS-clmjNsmfnIDrocDl8vq5hezz8Z2O&s=lu9RHqkzfd22a2b77n6eGbkchSqmPQeOPVqaJ7moD68&e= TIA _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io Unless otherwise stated above: Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : 17, avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 664 614 175,50 € SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 - Code NAF 6203Z
participants (4)
-
Guillaume ABRIOUX
-
Ilya Dryomov
-
Venky Shankar
-
Yuri Weinstein