If it uses PriorityQueue
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_queue#:~:text=In%20computer%20science%2C%20a%20priority,an%20element%20with%20low%20priority.>
Data
Structure an element with high priority should be dequeued before an
element with low priority.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:32 PM Seena Fallah <seenafallah(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"Higher recovery priority might cause performance
degradation until
recovery completes."
But what about this statement? I found this that it means if I set
priority to 63, I will lose the cluster performance for clients. Am I
wrong? Does it mean the performance for recovery?
I'm using nautilus 14.2.14.
[1]
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/1.3/html…
Can you please point me to the correct section. I don't find the point of
this doc.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:04 PM Peter Lieven <pl(a)kamp.de> wrote:
> Am 02.12.20 um 15:04 schrieb Seena Fallah:
> > I don't think so! I want to slow down the recovery not speed up and it
> says
> > I should reduce these values.
>
>
> I read the documentation the same. Low value = low weight, High value =
> high weight. [1]
>
> Operations with higher weight get easier dispatched.
>
>
> May I ask which exact issue are you seeing and which ceph version are you
> using?
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> [1]
>
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/1.3/html…
>
>
>
>