There should not be any performance difference between an un-containerized version and a
containerized one.
The shift to containers makes sense, as this is the general direction that the industry as
a whole is taking. I would suggest giving cephadm a try, it's relatively straight
forward and significantly faster for deployments then ceph-ansible is.
________________________________
From: Matthew Vernon <mv3(a)sanger.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:50 PM
To: ceph-users <ceph-users(a)ceph.io>
Subject: [ceph-users] ceph-ansible in Pacific and beyond?
Hi,
I caught up with Sage's talk on what to expect in Pacific (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVtn53MbxTc ) and there was no mention
of ceph-ansible at all.
Is it going to continue to be supported? We use it (and uncontainerised
packages) for all our clusters, so I'd be a bit alarmed if it was going
to go away...
Regards,
Matthew
--
The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io