I added a run and rerun for the fs suite on a fix https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62492 Venky, pls review and if approved I will merge it to reef and cherry-pick to the release branch. On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 8:04 AM Adam King <adking@redhat.com> wrote:

orch approved. The suite is obviously quite red, but the vast majority of the failures are just due to the lack of a proper ignorelist in the orch suite on reef.

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 5:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD

Seeking approvals/reviews for:

smoke - Laura approved?

rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky is fixing QA suite, will need to be added and rerun

orch - Adam King approved?

rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved? upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look.

upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look.

ceph-volume - Guillaume is fixing it.

TIA _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

Hi Yuri, On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 8:59 PM Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 8:37 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

I added a run and rerun for the fs suite on a fix https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62492

Venky, pls review and if approved I will merge it to reef and cherry-pick to the release branch.

Noted. I will let you know when it's ready to merge.

The PR has been approved and is ready to merge (once it finishes jenkins tests).

...

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 8:04 AM Adam King <adking@redhat.com> wrote:

...

orch approved. The suite is obviously quite red, but the vast majority of the failures are just due to the lack of a proper ignorelist in the orch suite on reef.

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 5:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD

Seeking approvals/reviews for:

smoke - Laura approved?

rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky is fixing QA suite, will need to be added and rerun

orch - Adam King approved?

rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved? upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look.

upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look.

ceph-volume - Guillaume is fixing it.

TIA _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

-- Cheers, Venky

-- Cheers, Venky

Yuri, as of when did 18.2.5 include the latest squid branch? If [1] is included in 18.2.5, then we really need [2] merged before release, as it would be blocking Rook. [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62095 (merged to squid on March 19) [2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70667 Thanks! Travis On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:09 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD

Seeking approvals/reviews for:

smoke - Laura approved?

rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky is fixing QA suite, will need to be added and rerun

orch - Adam King approved?

rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?

Hi Yuri,

rbd and krbd approved.

...

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look.

I don't recall seeing this before -- try rerunning it a couple of times?

Thanks,

Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

Ack, Travis I was about to reply the same. Venky, Guillaume the PRs below were cherry-picked I will rerun the fs and ceph-volume tests when the build is done https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62492/commits https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62178/commits On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:20 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> wrote:

Oh sorry, forget my last email, thanks Laura for pointing out the obvious that this is for reef, not squid!

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:46 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Yuri, as of when did 18.2.5 include the latest squid branch? If [1] is included in 18.2.5, then we really need [2] merged before release, as it would be blocking Rook.

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62095 (merged to squid on March 19) [2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70667

Thanks! Travis

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:09 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:

...

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD

Seeking approvals/reviews for:

smoke - Laura approved?

rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky is fixing QA suite, will need to be added and rerun

orch - Adam King approved?

rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?

Hi Yuri,

rbd and krbd approved.

...

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look.

I don't recall seeing this before -- try rerunning it a couple of times?

Thanks,

Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

quincy-x approved: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/REEF#v1825-httpstrackercephcomi... Asking Radek and Neha about pacific-x. On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:54 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Venky, Guillaume pls review and approve fs and orch/cepadm

Still awaiting arrivals:

rados - Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky approved?

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look. There are multiple runs

upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look.

ceph-volume - Guillaume approved?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:26 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Ack, Travis I was about to reply the same.

Venky, Guillaume the PRs below were cherry-picked I will rerun the fs and ceph-volume tests when the build is done

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62492/commits https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62178/commits

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:20 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>

wrote:

...

...

Oh sorry, forget my last email, thanks Laura for pointing out the

obvious that this is for reef, not squid!

...

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:46 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>

wrote:

...

...

Yuri, as of when did 18.2.5 include the latest squid branch? If [1]

is included in 18.2.5, then we really need [2] merged before release, as it would be blocking Rook.

...

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62095 (merged to squid on

March 19)

...

[2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70667

Thanks! Travis

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:09 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:

...

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>

wrote:

...

...

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD

Seeking approvals/reviews for:

smoke - Laura approved?

rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King

approved?

...

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky is fixing QA suite, will need to be added and rerun

orch - Adam King approved?

rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?

Hi Yuri,

rbd and krbd approved.

...

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look.

I don't recall seeing this before -- try rerunning it a couple of times?

Thanks,

Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

---

Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

-- Laura Flores She/Her/Hers Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io> Chicago, IL lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

dashboard approved on behalf of @Afreen Misbah <afrahman@redhat.com> (since she is on vacation) Regards, Nizam On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 2:36 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Release Notes -

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62589 https://github.com/ceph/ceph.io/pull/856

Still seeking approvals/reviews for:

rados - Travis? Nizamudeen?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky approved?

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look.

upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha?

ceph-volume - Guillaume approved?

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 12:14 PM Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> wrote:

...

quincy-x approved:

https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/REEF#v1825-httpstrackercephcomi...

...

Asking Radek and Neha about pacific-x.

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:54 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Venky, Guillaume pls review and approve fs and orch/cepadm

Still awaiting arrivals:

rados - Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky approved?

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look. There are multiple runs

upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look.

ceph-volume - Guillaume approved?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:26 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Ack, Travis I was about to reply the same.

Venky, Guillaume the PRs below were cherry-picked I will rerun the fs and ceph-volume tests when the build is done

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62492/commits https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62178/commits

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:20 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>

wrote:

...

...

Oh sorry, forget my last email, thanks Laura for pointing out the

obvious that this is for reef, not squid!

...

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:46 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com

...

wrote:

...

...

...

Yuri, as of when did 18.2.5 include the latest squid branch? If [1]

is included in 18.2.5, then we really need [2] merged before release,

as it

...

...

would be blocking Rook.

...

...

...

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62095 (merged to squid on

March 19)

...

[2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70667

Thanks! Travis

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:09 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:40 PM Yuri Weinstein < yweinste@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > > LRC upgrade - TBD > > > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > > > smoke - Laura approved? > > > > rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? > > > > rgw - Adam E approved? > > > > fs - Venky is fixing QA suite, will need to be added and rerun > > > > orch - Adam King approved? > > > > rbd - Ilya approved? > > krbd - Ilya approved? > > Hi Yuri, > > rbd and krbd approved. > > > upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look. > > I don't recall seeing this before -- try rerunning it a couple of times? > > Thanks, > > Ilya > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

---

Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

--

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io>

Chicago, IL

lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

-- Nizamudeen A Sr. Software Engineer - IBM Partner Engineer IBM and Red Hat Ceph Storage Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://www.redhat.com/>

On 31/03/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

Release Notes -

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62589 https://github.com/ceph/ceph.io/pull/856

[snip]

rgw - Adam E approved?

RGW approved!

sorry for the late notice, but a data loss bug was reported against rgw yesterday in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70746. we suspect the regression came from https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58213 whose reef backport was included in 18.2.5 for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67268 the fix in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62604 hasn't merged to main yet, but initial testing looks promising for 18.2.5, i think we have two choices: - wait for https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62604 and its reef backport, or - revert the backport that caused the regression. if we revert, then 18.2.5 will continue to leak tail objects from server-side copies, but at least it won't lose data On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 1:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Thank you all for review and approval

The only remaining issues are:

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya and Josh looked with no conclusion yet upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - Laura is looking

Neha, can you take a look at those and reply with recommendations or approval as is?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:32 AM Adam Emerson <aemerson@redhat.com> wrote:

...

On 31/03/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

Release Notes -

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62589 https://github.com/ceph/ceph.io/pull/856

[snip]

...

rgw - Adam E approved?

RGW approved!

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

On 2025-04-02 16:54, Casey Bodley wrote:

sorry for the late notice, but a data loss bug was reported against rgw yesterday in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70746. we suspect the regression came from https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58213 whose reef backport was included in 18.2.5 for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67268

the fix in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62604 hasn't merged to main yet, but initial testing looks promising

I see that this was also backported to squid https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58933 Guess this means squid could also be affected by the data loss bug and would benefit from the above fix? ty, peter.

for 18.2.5, i think we have two choices: - wait for https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62604 and its reef backport, or - revert the backport that caused the regression. if we revert, then 18.2.5 will continue to leak tail objects from server-side copies, but at least it won't lose data

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 1:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Thank you all for review and approval

The only remaining issues are:

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya and Josh looked with no conclusion yet upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - Laura is looking

Neha, can you take a look at those and reply with recommendations or approval as is?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:32 AM Adam Emerson <aemerson@redhat.com> wrote:

...

On 31/03/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

Release Notes -

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62589 https://github.com/ceph/ceph.io/pull/856

[snip]

...

rgw - Adam E approved?

RGW approved!

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

The rgw fix is being worked on https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70788 Josh, Adam we need to decide - whether to apply the fix or revert the previous PR pacific-x - Josh and Neha agreed that this suite can be excluded We also need to make a call on: upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef Ilya, you are the only person who can make such a call. WDYT? Thx On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 6:42 AM Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 4:04 AM Peter Sabaini <peter@sabaini.at> wrote:

...

On 2025-04-02 16:54, Casey Bodley wrote:

...

sorry for the late notice, but a data loss bug was reported against rgw yesterday in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70746. we suspect the regression came from https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58213 whose reef backport was included in 18.2.5 for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67268

the fix in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62604 hasn't merged to main yet, but initial testing looks promising

I see that this was also backported to squid https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58933 Guess this means squid could also be affected by the data loss bug and would benefit from the above fix?

thanks Peter, that's right. it was present in the squid 19.2.0 release where it was noticed. to clarify, the data loss only occurs when an object is copied onto itself

...

ty, peter.

...

for 18.2.5, i think we have two choices: - wait for https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62604 and its reef backport, or - revert the backport that caused the regression. if we revert, then 18.2.5 will continue to leak tail objects from server-side copies, but at least it won't lose data

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 1:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Thank you all for review and approval

The only remaining issues are:

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya and Josh looked with no conclusion yet upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - Laura is looking

Neha, can you take a look at those and reply with recommendations or approval as is?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:32 AM Adam Emerson <aemerson@redhat.com> wrote:

...

On 31/03/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

Release Notes -

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62589 https://github.com/ceph/ceph.io/pull/856

[snip]

...

rgw - Adam E approved?

RGW approved!

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

---

Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

Thank you, Ilya I will merge and cherry-pick it. Adam Emerson, I did a rerun on Build 3 rgw on the fix, pls approve it https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 All issues were addressed and I will start the publishing process as soon as the issues above are closed. On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 10:58 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:15 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

The rgw fix is being worked on https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70788

Josh, Adam we need to decide - whether to apply the fix or revert the previous PR

pacific-x - Josh and Neha agreed that this suite can be excluded

We also need to make a call on: upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef

Ilya, you are the only person who can make such a call. WDYT?

I managed to look into upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef issue today. It was obscured because a few lines of output generated by src/test/librbd/test_notify.py apparently get buffered by the stream inside of libc and don't make it into teuthology.log at all after the script gets killed.

Yuri, this failure can be ignored. I raised a test-only PR [1] with the technical details in the description, you can merge it and cherry pick to reef-release if you are in the mood for rerunning upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef instead of waiving the failure.

Zack, is there some option that could be set on the machinery that makes output forwarding to teuthology.log happen to force line buffering so that it behaves as if outputting to a terminal?

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62688

Thanks,

Ilya

On 07/04/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

Adam, ee are ready for the next steps as soon as rgw is approved

RGW approved!

On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 7:58 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:

It was obscured because a few lines of output generated by src/test/librbd/test_notify.py apparently get buffered by the stream inside of libc and don't make it into teuthology.log at all after the script gets killed.

Zack, is there some option that could be set on the machinery that makes output forwarding to teuthology.log happen to force line buffering so that it behaves as if outputting to a terminal?

Never mind, I realized that this can't really be blamed on teuthology: https://ceph-storage.slack.com/archives/C054Q1NUBQT/p1743933913222329?thread_ts=1742486102.780579&cid=C054Q1NUBQT Thanks, Ilya

Hi Yuri, ceph-volume approved. (All the errors we can see in the run you linked are not related to ceph-volume.) Regards, -- Guillaume Abrioux Software Engineer From: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> Date: Thursday, 27 March 2025 at 15:57 To: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> Cc: dev <dev@ceph.io>, ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.5 QE validation status Venky, Guillaume pls review and approve fs and orch/cepadm Still awaiting arrivals: rados - Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? rgw - Adam E approved? fs - Venky approved? upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look. There are multiple runs upgrade/pacific-x (reef) - can this be deprecated? Josh? Neha? upgrade/quincy-x (reef) - Laura, Prashant please take a look. ceph-volume - Guillaume approved? On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:26 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Ack, Travis I was about to reply the same.

Venky, Guillaume the PRs below were cherry-picked I will rerun the fs and ceph-volume tests when the build is done

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62492/commits https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62178/commits

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:20 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Oh sorry, forget my last email, thanks Laura for pointing out the obvious that this is for reef, not squid!

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:46 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Yuri, as of when did 18.2.5 include the latest squid branch? If [1] is included in 18.2.5, then we really need [2] merged before release, as it would be blocking Rook.

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62095 (merged to squid on March 19) [2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70667

Thanks! Travis

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:09 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:

...

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:40 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70563#note-1 Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD

Seeking approvals/reviews for:

smoke - Laura approved?

rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved?

rgw - Adam E approved?

fs - Venky is fixing QA suite, will need to be added and rerun

orch - Adam King approved?

rbd - Ilya approved? krbd - Ilya approved?

Hi Yuri,

rbd and krbd approved.

...

upgrade-clients:client-upgrade-octopus-reef-reef - Ilya please take a look.

I don't recall seeing this before -- try rerunning it a couple of times?

Thanks,

Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io Unless otherwise stated above: Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : 17, avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 664 614 175,50 € SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 - Code NAF 6203Z