Re: [ceph-users] Re: Migration to ceph.readthedocs.io underway
Hi Marc, On 9/17/20 11:16 AM, Marc Roos wrote:
This[1] and natural evolution(?)
[1] https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/v1.9.0/ Support Read the Docs!
Please help keep us sustainable by allowing our Ethical Ads in your ad blocker or go ad-free by subscribing.
Thank you! ❤️
Thanks for the info! That prompted me to read up some more on this. RTD is actually quite open and honest about their advertising model [1] and they do provide options to opt out of paid ads [2], so that's definitely an option that we should consider disabling, if we haven't done so already. At present, I personally feel that the benefits of hosting the docs on their platform vs. doing it on our own infrastructure are an acceptable trade-off for ads, especially if these are about other open source projects only. As RTD is really an aggregation point for a lot of other open source projects, it may also help us to gain visibility. Of course, if "natural evolution" really kicks in and things get too intrusive/annoying, we should re-evaluate this and take action accordingly. Lenz [1] https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advertising/index.html [2] https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advertising/ethical-advertising.html#o... -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nuernberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
Den tors 17 sep. 2020 kl 12:09 skrev Lenz Grimmer <lgrimmer@suse.com>:
https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/v1.9.0/ Support Read the Docs!
Please help keep us sustainable by allowing our Ethical Ads in your ad blocker or go ad-free by subscribing.
Thanks for the info! That prompted me to read up some more on this. RTD is actually quite open and honest about their advertising model [1] and they do provide options to opt out of paid ads [2], so that's definitely an option that we should consider disabling, if we haven't done so already. At present, I personally feel that the benefits of hosting the docs on their platform vs. doing it on our own infrastructure are an acceptable trade-off for ads, especially if these are about other open source projects only.
I think many see the similarities to things like Sourceforge and related sites that were very free/open source friendly, but then at some point decided money was better than ethics, sold it off to someone else who started to inject scary malware into the downloadable installers. Everyone that doesn't scramble off such a site quickly as soon as this becomes public will get their reputation tainted if such an event happens. Not saying it will, just remembering that it has happened before and that you don't get any advance warning when the hosters turn to evil practices. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
participants (2)
-
Janne Johansson
-
Lenz Grimmer