16 Mar
2020
16 Mar
'20
11:43 a.m.
Hello,
I use "make-debs.sh" script to build debian packages, but instead of
getting *-dbg packages, I get packages like
"ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb", which cannot be
imported by reprepro, with errors like:
Unknown file type: 'a2e592c703334bc9f55a62f6fac267d8 135503940 debug
optional ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb',
assuming source format...
Warning: File 'ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb'
looks like source but does not start with 'ceph_'!
I must have missed something about the package building procedure.
What supposed to be the right way to build deb packages?
Best,
Can Zhang
17 Mar
17 Mar
7:17 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:13 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
Hello,
I use "make-debs.sh" script to build debian packages, but instead of
getting *-dbg packages, I get packages like
"ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb", which cannot be
imported by reprepro, with errors like:
Unknown file type: 'a2e592c703334bc9f55a62f6fac267d8 135503940 debug
optional ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb',
assuming source format...
Warning: File 'ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb'
looks like source but does not start with 'ceph_'!
that's a known issue. see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730572 .
I must have missed something about the package building procedure.
What supposed to be the right way to build deb packages?
please read https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages for more
info regarding to ddeb.
i'd suggest search for answers first before shooting the question
right to the maling list .
Best,
Can Zhang
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
--
Regards
Kefu Chai
12:12 p.m.
Thanks for the reply. After some tinkering, I understand that
"make-debs.sh" intentionally remove *-dbg package building in normal
situations, quote "...and remove -dbg packages because they are large
and take time to build", so I comment out those lines:
====
diff --git a/make-debs.sh b/make-debs.sh
index 5a7ca1aff5..650940ccf2 100755
--- a/make-debs.sh
+++ b/make-debs.sh
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ tar -C $releasedir -jxf $releasedir/ceph_$vers.orig.tar.bz2
#
cp -a debian $releasedir/ceph-$vers/debian
cd $releasedir
-perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))' ceph-$vers/debian/control
-perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
+#perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))' ceph-$vers/debian/control
+#perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
#
# always set the debian version to 1 which is ok because the debian
# directory is included in the sources and the upstream version will
====
now the script could generate *-dbg*.deb files as expected.
Best,
Can Zhang
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:47 AM kefu chai <tchaikov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:13 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use "make-debs.sh" script to build debian packages, but instead of
> > getting *-dbg packages, I get packages like
> > "ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb", which cannot
be
> > imported by reprepro, with errors like:
> >
> > Unknown file type: 'a2e592c703334bc9f55a62f6fac267d8 135503940 debug
> > optional ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb',
> > assuming source format...
> > Warning: File 'ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb'
> > looks like source but does not start with 'ceph_'!
>
> that's a known issue. see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730572 .
>
> >
> > I must have missed something about the package building procedure.
> > What supposed to be the right way to build deb packages?
> >
>
> please read https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages for more
> info regarding to ddeb.
>
> i'd suggest search for answers first before shooting the question
> right to the maling list .
>
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Can Zhang
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Kefu Chai
26 Mar
26 Mar
5:58 a.m.
Hello,
I have a follow-up question. As the dbg packages in ubuntu, not like
rpm, don't have source code included, I also installed the source
package, and instruct gdb to find the directory with command
"directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11", but it seems not
working:
(gdb) directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src
Source directories searched: /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src:$cdir:$cwd
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f3aafa619f3 in futex_wait_cancelable (private=<optimized
out>, expected=0, futex_word=0x564f5aedf1d8) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futex-internal.h:88
#1 __pthread_cond_wait_common (abstime=0x0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030,
cond=0x564f5aedf1b0) at pthread_cond_wait.c:502
#2 __pthread_cond_wait (cond=0x564f5aedf1b0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030) at
pthread_cond_wait.c:655
#3 0x0000564f4f3ff747 in AsyncMessenger::wait() ()
#4 0x0000564f4eb2119e in main ()
could you help me with debugging in ubuntu environment?
Best,
Can Zhang
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:42 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply. After some tinkering, I understand that
> "make-debs.sh" intentionally remove *-dbg package building in normal
> situations, quote "...and remove -dbg packages because they are large
> and take time to build", so I comment out those lines:
> ====
> diff --git a/make-debs.sh b/make-debs.sh
> index 5a7ca1aff5..650940ccf2 100755
> --- a/make-debs.sh
> +++ b/make-debs.sh
> @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ tar -C $releasedir -jxf $releasedir/ceph_$vers.orig.tar.bz2
> #
> cp -a debian $releasedir/ceph-$vers/debian
> cd $releasedir
> -perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))'
ceph-$vers/debian/control
> -perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
> +#perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))'
ceph-$vers/debian/control
> +#perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
> #
> # always set the debian version to 1 which is ok because the debian
> # directory is included in the sources and the upstream version will
> ====
> now the script could generate *-dbg*.deb files as expected.
>
>
>
> Best,
> Can Zhang
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:47 AM kefu chai <tchaikov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:13 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I use "make-debs.sh" script to build debian packages, but instead
of
> > > getting *-dbg packages, I get packages like
> > > "ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb", which
cannot be
> > > imported by reprepro, with errors like:
> > >
> > > Unknown file type: 'a2e592c703334bc9f55a62f6fac267d8 135503940 debug
> > > optional ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb',
> > > assuming source format...
> > > Warning: File
'ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb'
> > > looks like source but does not start with 'ceph_'!
> >
> > that's a known issue. see
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730572 .
> >
> > >
> > > I must have missed something about the package building procedure.
> > > What supposed to be the right way to build deb packages?
> > >
> >
> > please read https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages for more
> > info regarding to ddeb.
> >
> > i'd suggest search for answers first before shooting the question
> > right to the maling list .
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Can Zhang
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> > Kefu Chai
12:13 p.m.
The source for frames 0 to 2 are not part of ceph, they are part of
glibc (libpthread).
This is what I normally do.
# apt-get install ceph-osd ceph-osd-dbg
# mkdir build && cd $_
# apt-get source ceph-osd
# cd ..
# gdb -d build/ /usr/bin/ceph-osd CoreDump
Something like that should work for you too (at least for the actual
ceph frames).
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:29 AM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
Hello,
I have a follow-up question. As the dbg packages in ubuntu, not like
rpm, don't have source code included, I also installed the source
package, and instruct gdb to find the directory with command
"directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11", but it seems not
working:
(gdb) directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src
Source directories searched: /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src:$cdir:$cwd
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f3aafa619f3 in futex_wait_cancelable (private=<optimized
out>, expected=0, futex_word=0x564f5aedf1d8) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futex-internal.h:88
#1 __pthread_cond_wait_common (abstime=0x0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030,
cond=0x564f5aedf1b0) at pthread_cond_wait.c:502
#2 __pthread_cond_wait (cond=0x564f5aedf1b0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030) at
pthread_cond_wait.c:655
#3 0x0000564f4f3ff747 in AsyncMessenger::wait() ()
#4 0x0000564f4eb2119e in main ()
could you help me with debugging in ubuntu environment?
Best,
Can Zhang
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:42 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
--
Cheers,
Brad
Thanks for the reply. After some tinkering, I understand that
"make-debs.sh" intentionally remove *-dbg package building in normal
situations, quote "...and remove -dbg packages because they are large
and take time to build", so I comment out those lines:
====
diff --git a/make-debs.sh b/make-debs.sh
index 5a7ca1aff5..650940ccf2 100755
--- a/make-debs.sh
+++ b/make-debs.sh
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ tar -C $releasedir -jxf $releasedir/ceph_$vers.orig.tar.bz2
#
cp -a debian $releasedir/ceph-$vers/debian
cd $releasedir
-perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))' ceph-$vers/debian/control
-perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
+#perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))' ceph-$vers/debian/control
+#perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
#
# always set the debian version to 1 which is ok because the debian
# directory is included in the sources and the upstream version will
====
now the script could generate *-dbg*.deb files as expected.
Best,
Can Zhang
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:47 AM kefu chai <tchaikov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:13 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use "make-debs.sh" script to build debian packages, but instead of
> > getting *-dbg packages, I get packages like
> > "ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb", which cannot
be
> > imported by reprepro, with errors like:
> >
> > Unknown file type: 'a2e592c703334bc9f55a62f6fac267d8 135503940 debug
> > optional ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb',
> > assuming source format...
> > Warning: File 'ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb'
> > looks like source but does not start with 'ceph_'!
>
> that's a known issue. see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730572 .
>
> >
> > I must have missed something about the package building procedure.
> > What supposed to be the right way to build deb packages?
> >
>
> please read https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages for more
> info regarding to ddeb.
>
> i'd suggest search for answers first before shooting the question
> right to the maling list .
>
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Can Zhang
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Kefu Chai
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
27 Mar
27 Mar
6:21 a.m.
Thanks for the reply. Actually I made a mistake by claiming "dbg
packages in ubuntu don't have source code included". Here's a little
more information about making sure the binary and dbg package match:
$ file /usr/bin/ceph-osd
/usr/bin/ceph-osd: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1
(GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/l, for GNU/Linux
3.2.0, BuildID[sha1]=8a15177a5cb79533f396ef01e68ba1a2025f07a1,
stripped
$ ll /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/8a/15177a5cb79533f396ef01e68ba1a2025f07a1.debug
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 195M Mar 26 17:27
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/8a/15177a5cb79533f396ef01e68ba1a2025f07a1.debug
The binary has a "BuildID" field, and gdb would try to find the
corresponding debug file under /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
Hope it would help, and sorry for the disturbance.
Best,
Can Zhang
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:43 PM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The source for frames 0 to 2 are not part of ceph, they are part of
> glibc (libpthread).
>
> This is what I normally do.
>
> # apt-get install ceph-osd ceph-osd-dbg
> # mkdir build && cd $_
> # apt-get source ceph-osd
> # cd ..
> # gdb -d build/ /usr/bin/ceph-osd CoreDump
>
> Something like that should work for you too (at least for the actual
> ceph frames).
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:29 AM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a follow-up question. As the dbg packages in ubuntu, not like
> > rpm, don't have source code included, I also installed the source
> > package, and instruct gdb to find the directory with command
> > "directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11", but it seems not
> > working:
> >
> > (gdb) directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src
> > Source directories searched: /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src:$cdir:$cwd
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x00007f3aafa619f3 in futex_wait_cancelable (private=<optimized
> > out>, expected=0, futex_word=0x564f5aedf1d8) at
> > ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futex-internal.h:88
> > #1 __pthread_cond_wait_common (abstime=0x0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030,
> > cond=0x564f5aedf1b0) at pthread_cond_wait.c:502
> > #2 __pthread_cond_wait (cond=0x564f5aedf1b0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030) at
> > pthread_cond_wait.c:655
> > #3 0x0000564f4f3ff747 in AsyncMessenger::wait() ()
> > #4 0x0000564f4eb2119e in main ()
> >
> >
> > could you help me with debugging in ubuntu environment?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Can Zhang
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:42 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reply. After some tinkering, I understand that
> > > "make-debs.sh" intentionally remove *-dbg package building in
normal
> > > situations, quote "...and remove -dbg packages because they are large
> > > and take time to build", so I comment out those lines:
> > > ====
> > > diff --git a/make-debs.sh b/make-debs.sh
> > > index 5a7ca1aff5..650940ccf2 100755
> > > --- a/make-debs.sh
> > > +++ b/make-debs.sh
> > > @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ tar -C $releasedir -jxf
$releasedir/ceph_$vers.orig.tar.bz2
> > > #
> > > cp -a debian $releasedir/ceph-$vers/debian
> > > cd $releasedir
> > > -perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))'
ceph-$vers/debian/control
> > > -perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
> > > +#perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))'
ceph-$vers/debian/control
> > > +#perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
> > > #
> > > # always set the debian version to 1 which is ok because the debian
> > > # directory is included in the sources and the upstream version will
> > > ====
> > > now the script could generate *-dbg*.deb files as expected.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Can Zhang
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:47 AM kefu chai <tchaikov(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:13 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I use "make-debs.sh" script to build debian packages,
but instead of
> > > > > getting *-dbg packages, I get packages like
> > > > > "ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb",
which cannot be
> > > > > imported by reprepro, with errors like:
> > > > >
> > > > > Unknown file type: 'a2e592c703334bc9f55a62f6fac267d8
135503940 debug
> > > > > optional
ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb',
> > > > > assuming source format...
> > > > > Warning: File
'ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb'
> > > > > looks like source but does not start with 'ceph_'!
> > > >
> > > > that's a known issue. see
> > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730572 .
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I must have missed something about the package building
procedure.
> > > > > What supposed to be the right way to build deb packages?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > please read https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages for more
> > > > info regarding to ddeb.
> > > >
> > > > i'd suggest search for answers first before shooting the question
> > > > right to the maling list .
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Can Zhang
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards
> > > > Kefu Chai
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
>
6:37 a.m.
Yes, they always need to match. You can use the following to keep
track of buildids.
build-id from an executable, shared library or separate debuginfo
file:·
$ eu-unstrip -n -e <exec|.sharedlib|.debug>
build-ids of an executable and all shared libraries from a core
file:·
$ eu-unstrip -n --core <corefile>
build-ids of an executable and all shared libraries of a running
process:·
$ eu-unstrip -n --pid <pid>
build-id of the running kernel and all loaded modules:·
$ eu-unstrip -n -k
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:52 AM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Actually I made a mistake by claiming "dbg
packages in ubuntu don't have source code included". Here's a little
more information about making sure the binary and dbg package match:
$ file /usr/bin/ceph-osd
/usr/bin/ceph-osd: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1
(GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/l, for GNU/Linux
3.2.0, BuildID[sha1]=8a15177a5cb79533f396ef01e68ba1a2025f07a1,
stripped
$ ll /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/8a/15177a5cb79533f396ef01e68ba1a2025f07a1.debug
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 195M Mar 26 17:27
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/8a/15177a5cb79533f396ef01e68ba1a2025f07a1.debug
The binary has a "BuildID" field, and gdb would try to find the
corresponding debug file under /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
Hope it would help, and sorry for the disturbance.
Best,
Can Zhang
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:43 PM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
--
Cheers,
Brad
The source for frames 0 to 2 are not part of ceph, they are part of
glibc (libpthread).
This is what I normally do.
# apt-get install ceph-osd ceph-osd-dbg
# mkdir build && cd $_
# apt-get source ceph-osd
# cd ..
# gdb -d build/ /usr/bin/ceph-osd CoreDump
Something like that should work for you too (at least for the actual
ceph frames).
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:29 AM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
Hello,
I have a follow-up question. As the dbg packages in ubuntu, not like
rpm, don't have source code included, I also installed the source
package, and instruct gdb to find the directory with command
"directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11", but it seems not
working:
(gdb) directory /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src
Source directories searched: /usr/src/ceph-14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11/src:$cdir:$cwd
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f3aafa619f3 in futex_wait_cancelable (private=<optimized
out>, expected=0, futex_word=0x564f5aedf1d8) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futex-internal.h:88
#1 __pthread_cond_wait_common (abstime=0x0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030,
cond=0x564f5aedf1b0) at pthread_cond_wait.c:502
#2 __pthread_cond_wait (cond=0x564f5aedf1b0, mutex=0x564f5aedf030) at
pthread_cond_wait.c:655
#3 0x0000564f4f3ff747 in AsyncMessenger::wait() ()
#4 0x0000564f4eb2119e in main ()
could you help me with debugging in ubuntu environment?
Best,
Can Zhang
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:42 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
--
Cheers,
Brad
Thanks for the reply. After some tinkering, I understand that
"make-debs.sh" intentionally remove *-dbg package building in normal
situations, quote "...and remove -dbg packages because they are large
and take time to build", so I comment out those lines:
====
diff --git a/make-debs.sh b/make-debs.sh
index 5a7ca1aff5..650940ccf2 100755
--- a/make-debs.sh
+++ b/make-debs.sh
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ tar -C $releasedir -jxf $releasedir/ceph_$vers.orig.tar.bz2
#
cp -a debian $releasedir/ceph-$vers/debian
cd $releasedir
-perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))' ceph-$vers/debian/control
-perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
+#perl -ni -e 'print if(!(/^Package: .*-dbg$/../^$/))' ceph-$vers/debian/control
+#perl -pi -e 's/--dbg-package.*//' ceph-$vers/debian/rules
#
# always set the debian version to 1 which is ok because the debian
# directory is included in the sources and the upstream version will
====
now the script could generate *-dbg*.deb files as expected.
Best,
Can Zhang
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:47 AM kefu chai <tchaikov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:13 PM Can Zhang <can(a)canx.me> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use "make-debs.sh" script to build debian packages, but instead of
> > getting *-dbg packages, I get packages like
> > "ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb", which cannot
be
> > imported by reprepro, with errors like:
> >
> > Unknown file type: 'a2e592c703334bc9f55a62f6fac267d8 135503940 debug
> > optional ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb',
> > assuming source format...
> > Warning: File 'ceph-base-dbgsym_14.2.7-75-g14b67dbc11-1_amd64.ddeb'
> > looks like source but does not start with 'ceph_'!
>
> that's a known issue. see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730572 .
>
> >
> > I must have missed something about the package building procedure.
> > What supposed to be the right way to build deb packages?
> >
>
> please read https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages for more
> info regarding to ddeb.
>
> i'd suggest search for answers first before shooting the question
> right to the maling list .
>
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Can Zhang
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Kefu Chai
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
1492
days inactive
1503
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Brad Hubbard -
Can Zhang -
kefu chai