Hi Cephers, These are the topics covered in today's meeting: - *[Patrick] Any objections to running clean-ci now?* Do you have any important branches in ceph-ci? - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61709 - Joseph asked if it could delete branches similarly to GitHub UI/API so that they can be restored if needed? - *[Radek] Switching default build type for non-.git builds** to RelWithDebInfo.* This affects downstreams (if no build type is specified)! - Matan's PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61637/ - [Sam] Can it be done with CFLAGS instead? To be announced in ceph-dev. Set default/fall back to Release, which seems the safest. - [Greg] Not all releases are of "Release" type, some include debug info. - [Matan] 1. Release: `-O3 -DNDEBUG` 2. Debug: `-O0 -g` 3. RelWithDebInfo: `-O2 -g -DNDEBUG` 4. MinSizeRel: `-Os -DNDEBUG` - [JosephM] this needs to be backported. - *[Dan-probably absent today**] Upgrade 17.2.8 to 18.2.4 is currently broken*: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67660 (Cephadm feature backported to quincy before reef). - 18.2.5 is next, right? Can it be quick pls? - QA question: do we test upgrade from the candidate to the current maj_ver+1? This kind of thing should have been caught. - [Neha]To be followed up offline (QA is currently blocked by the ceph-ci too-many-branches issue). - *[Joseph Mundackal] - containerized builds* - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59841 - initial version of this merged. Looking for feedback and missing features. - Open trackers to build on ubuntu 24 - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62804 - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69240 (open PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61326) - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69525 - [Matan] There might be issues with compiler versions (e.g.: Ubuntu 22) - *[cbodley] stalebot on backport branches was enabled recently* in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60736 - can we revert? backport prs aren't tested promptly so someone would have to micromanage them to prevent closing - Revert PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61743 - *[Adam Kraitman] Virtualization solution for hosting the lab services* - VMWare (IBM paid/agreement with Broadcom) vs. Proxmox - [DavidG] temporary (~1 year) solution while infra is containerized. - [Greg] precedent of iSCSI. - NVMe-oF support in Proxmox? Not needed, librbd. Discussion on Tentacle schedule postponed till next week. Kind Regards, Ernesto