26 Feb
2023
26 Feb
'23
6:32 p.m.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:20 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 2:15 PM Patrick Schlangen <patrick(a)schlangen.me> wrote:
if librados still works with openssl 1.0 when you're not using it
elsewhere in the process, i don't see a compelling reason to break
that. maybe just add a #warning about it to librados.h?
Hi Ilya,
Removing OpenSSL 1.0 support is fine with me but it would need a wider
discussion. I'm CCing the development list.
Thanks,
Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io
Am 26.02.2023 um 14:05 schrieb Ilya Dryomov
<idryomov(a)gmail.com>om>:
Isn't OpenSSL 1.0 long out of support? I'm not sure if extending
librados API to support a workaround for something that went EOL over
three years ago is worth it.
fair point. However, as long as ceph still supports compiling against OpenSSL 1.0 and has
special code paths to initialize OpenSSL for versions <= 1.0, I think this should be
fixed. The other option would be to remove OpenSSL 1.0 support completely.
What do you think?