rebase helper tool

I'm currently rebasing a branch that diverged for quite a while and introduced many changes that include a lot of code movement. I wrote a tool to help me streamline a lot of the repetitive work that I am doing when rebasing. It's not all I wanted to have, far from it, but others might find it useful too: https://github.com/yehudasa/rebase-tools Consider a workflow were we have a feature branch, and a master branch that diverged. We want now to rebase feature branch on top of master branch. We can either cherry-pick each commit, or run a 'git rebase' command. The tool is just a bash script that analyzes a 'git diff' after a failed cherry-pick and automates some of the steps that I usually take when dealing with it. It produces an annotation of each line in that diff (of the HEAD part of each conflict) that shows what the source of that line is. Basically doing a git blame on those lines. It added value is that it also specifies whether this line is old (prior to feature branch creation), new (on feature branch, after its creation), or master (changed on the master branch). This helps focus on what were the changes that are needed to be looked at. See here a sample output: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/ispeNUIluZ3B0XvguSpQfA The usage is simple. First time it needs to be initialized (it creates a local cache of the relevant commits, might not be really needed eventually): ~/ceph/src $ ~/rebase-tools/init.sh <feature-branch> <master-branch> [subdir] Where subdir can be 'rgw' for example, so that it only keeps info about changes that happened under the rgw subdir. Then try to cherry-pick or rebase, and if there is a conflict: (note that it needs to be run from the repo root) ~ceph $ ~/rebase-tools/analyze.sh <feature-branch> <master-branch> <commit-id> where the commit-id is the id of the commit that failed. One of the things that it doesn't do now is that it doesn't show lines that were removed (either on master, or on feature). So need to keep that in mind when inspecting the changes. An improvement to the tool that could really help would be to have it show for each conflict how it changed on both master since branch creation. While this is easy to do manually, it could make work more streamlined. Hope that helps, Yehuda