On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 8:33 AM Brad Hubbard via ceph-users < ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 7:59 AM Yuri Weinstein via ceph-users < ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
We are continuing on this release.
powercycle - FAILED Brad, approved?
Unfortunately, I don't see any logs anywhere where I have access to them so I have no way of checking this?
OK, I have the latest logs. The three failing jobs appear to have all timed out after running for about six hours. At this time I don't know why but I continue to investigate.
ceph-volume - Approved Guillaume?
Patrick was reviewing some tests, please see his comments in the same tracker. TIA
On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 1:19 AM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users < ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:31 PM Yuri Weinstein via Dev <dev@ceph.io> wrote:
This test branch was built loner then 2.5 weeks ago I have to rebuild it first and then will schedule krbd
krbd approved based on
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-10_21:26:56-krbd-reef-release-testing...
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-12_18:20:32-krbd-reef-release-testing...
Thanks,
Ilya
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:39 PM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users <
ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:50 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 5:00 PM Venky Shankar via ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote: > > Hi Yuri, > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:34 AM Yuri Weinstein <
yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef
release
> > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 > > Release Notes - TBD > > LRC upgrade - N/A > > > > distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm > > > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > > > smoke - Laura approved? > > > > rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? > > (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request) > > > > rgw - Adam E approved? > > > > fs - Venky approved? > > There are lot many failures in the fs suite resembling > > Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs > type, bad option ... > > which is an issue with the testing kernel. Adding Alex who was looking > into this issue. > > As far as the run validation is concerned, it's risky to ignore
wrote: point the
> large number of failures. We have two options: > > - fix the testing kernel issue and rerun > - rerun with `for-linus` branch (with `-k for-linus` in the > teuthology-suite schedule command) > > The latter would be using an older kernel branch, but I think it > should suffice for this case.
Hi Venky,
With your report of the fs suite being affected as well, I carved out some time to take a look.
I think it's happening because XFS maintainers disabled support for V4 filesystems that was deprecated 5 years ago -- as of 6.18 kernel it's no longer compiled in by default. The proper fix would be to create an image with/move to V5 on-disk format; I have opened [1] to try to achieve that. We can also re-enable V4 on-disk format in our kernel builds as a workaround.
This should be fixed now. Yuri, please schedule a rerun for krbd.
Thanks,
Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
-- Cheers, Brad _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
-- Cheers, Brad