Hi Cephers, These are the topics that we just covered in today's meeting: - *Issues recording our meetings in Jitsi (Mike Perez)* - David Orman suggested using a self-hosted Jitsi instance: https://jitsi.github.io/handbook/docs/devops-guide/. Tested on a single container, with 4 cores for 4-5 attendees a call. - Help needed from Dan Mick & Adam Kraitman. - Ilya: this might scale for smaller meetings (dailies), but not for the larger ones (CDM, User-Devs, etc.). - *Reef release status review* - Josh: CentOS 9 blocked by Dashboard/Cephadm Python deps missing in CentOS 9. Casey: It's blocking teuthology testing. - Already discussed in devs mailing list a couple of months ago, for Quincy + Centos 9 (the missing packages would be the same). - Ken Dreyer preferred to keep the legacy approach (distro packages) instead of embedding Python deps. - Casey, Matt & Ernesto to resume that discussion with Ken Dreyer. - Other issues: - Radek: - Performance issue with RocksDB config. - Mismatching client-server features during upgrade. msgr encoder-decoder issues, introduced feature bit for Squid ( https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/1049d3e5eff0b7fa4fc9e5853494cb21c10b290a). Performance concerns. To be further discussed at Mark's Perf meeting (incl. Yuval) - Paul Cuzner perf testing Reef: higher CPU usage in Reef vs Quincy (more time spent in RocksDB get calls) - Target GA remains this June. Missing CentOS 9 packages becoming a blocker issue for the release. - *Perf regression in Pacific vs Nautilus (David Orman)* - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58530 - Mark: Missing change in upstream Rocksdb project. - David Orman: Is this degradation still happening in newer Rocksdb versions (reef)? Mark: No reason to think otherwise. Kind Regards, Ernesto