While we are waiting for finial rbd approval pls add your commits and
apporavls to the Release Notes PR
Thx
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 8:46 AM Mykola Golub <to.my.trociny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:19:25AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:00 AM Mykola Golub
<to.my.trociny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:56:00PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Just FYI, it is also reproducible on v14.2.21 (sha1:
5ef401921d7a88aea18ec7558f7f9374ebd8f5a6):
http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/trociny-2021-06-24_16:42:49-rbd-wip-mgo…
So it does not look like a regression. I was able to reproduce it on
centos only while on ubuntu it always passed for me.
Yuri's successful run which didn't include the last couple of rbd PRs
was also on ubuntu. But I do see a green centos job among your runs so
it doesn't appear to be OS specific:
http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/trociny-2021-06-24_15:01:11-rbd-wip-mgo…
Yes it could succeed on centos. What I meant is that I had naver seen
it to fail on ubuntu, though I also don't think it is OS specific. It
also did not fail when I increased the rbd debug level to track the
hang.
Filed
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51362 with
the (so far scarce)
details.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
Mykola Golub