On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:19 PM John Mulligan <phlogistonjohn@asynchrono.us> wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 9:57 AM John Mulligan <
On Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:58:30 PM EDT Kaleb Keithley wrote: phlogistonjohn@asynchrono.us>
wrote: ... If cephadm is a separate package (for some definition of package) I have to wonder why you're *not* working on adding them to Fedora and CentOS Storage SIG, where Ceph and several related packages are already being packaged for wide consumption.
cephadm is part of the packages. For RPM it is one of the many sub-packages in ceph.spec.in.
Yeah, my bad. I didn't remember every one of the dozens of subpackages. But there is a cephadm subpackage in the 17.2.6 (and earlier) packages in fedora and centos storage sig. I leapt to an incorrect conclusion when you said you were looking for someplace to distribute cephadm from. The implication seemed to be that it was a completely separate build from the rest of ceph. -- Kaleb