We are currently planning 3 tracks. If we find we really want more talks,
then we could possibly go back to 4, but it'll cost more. Let's see where
we end up.
As for how to organize the tracks... I'm not sure. Some of the general
categories I have in my head are:
- crimson stuff
- roadmap stuff (new features we want to talk to users about)
- user talks (experiences runnign ceph at scale etc)
- developer-focused talks. some of these might be better suited for
the Tuesday developer summit if they are really just trying to start a
conversation.
- ops stuff. kubernetes, rook, deployment tools, etc.
- tutorial.. there's a rook tutorial proposal (this time from Microsoft
and SK Telecom)
?
I added a red column that is supposed to add up the scores, but I can't
figure out why =sum(...) isn't working. But maybe we don't need that yet
until we have the scores in.
I hid my score column. I suggest after you finish entering your scores
you hide yours as well so that we have more independent scoring.
I added a orange keyword column that has things like "user",
"crimson",
"rgw", "cephfs", "tuning", etc. Feel free to update/adjust
that.. I
wasn't very careful. I also was tempted to add a 'vendor' keyword for
talks from vendors (red hat, suse, intel mostly) but I couldn't tell if I
being unfair; sometime these talks come from tech sales people who don't
have much hands-on experience running real clusters. OTOH, there were a
few talks from proserv folks who have the associated premature gray hair
to prove it and I wanted to hear from them. Somehow they seemed like
they'd be less vendor-ey, but not sure how to draw the line.
There were several duplciate submissions. I marked them DUP and put a
strikeout through them.
I highlighted the submission type when it was not a normal talk (i.e.,
lightning, panel, or tutorial) so that they were easy to spot.
Happy reviewing!
sage
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> It might also be useful if we had a rough outline of the session tracks before the
review, so we can rank talks per subject.
> Do we have a rough sketch already?
>
> The timing seems fine to me -- I'll try to get my ranks in in the next days.
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original message-----
> > From: Sage Weil <sage(a)newdream.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday 18th December 2019 10:06
> > To: cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc(a)ceph.io
> > Subject: [Cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc] Cephalcon talk review!
> >
> > Oh boy, here's the spreadsheet!
> >
> >
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bYCepH57ZjhuE3WoFUNQLfNOL2h2ti6Kln0…
> >
> > I created reviewer columns like last time. Did we just rate from 0-5
> > before? I can't remember. 0-5 seems reasonable?
> >
> > Currently the dates for this are:
> >
> > - speaker notifications Jan 13
> > - schedule published Jan 17
> >
> > I would love it if we could review these and put together a schedule
> > earlier. Sooner means we can publish a schedule sooner and people will
> > know what they are signing up for when they buy tickets and travel etc.
> > The challenges is the holidays. I'm going to be out Dec 26 - Jan 10, but
> >
> > I am going to try to do my reviews before that, and I can make time for a
> >
> > planning call or two the first week of Jan... or we can try to start the
> > discussion over email. If nothing else we can probably get the schedule
> > up by the 15th (W) instead of 17th (Fri) maybe?
> >
> > The other thing we need to start thinking about is keynotes. We should be
> >
> > on the looking for talk proposals that we can simply elevate to a keynote,
> >
> > or think about speakers that we could invite.
> >
> > Currently, the PC is
> >
> > - Dan (CERN)
> > - Josh (RH)
> > - Lars (SUSE)
> > - Matias (WD)
> > - Neha (RH)
> > - Patrick (RH)
> > - Sage (RH)
> >
> > I asked Florian to help again and he said no. Is there anyone else we
> > should invite?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > sage
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc mailing list -- cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc(a)ceph.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc-leave(a)ceph.io
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc mailing list -- cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc(a)ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc-leave(a)ceph.io
>
>