It might also be useful if we had a rough outline of the session tracks before the review,
so we can rank talks per subject.
Do we have a rough sketch already?
The timing seems fine to me -- I'll try to get my ranks in in the next days.
Dan
-----Original message-----
> From: Sage Weil <sage(a)newdream.net>
> Sent: Wednesday 18th December 2019 10:06
> To: cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc(a)ceph.io
> Subject: [Cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc] Cephalcon talk review!
>
> Oh boy, here's the spreadsheet!
>
>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bYCepH57ZjhuE3WoFUNQLfNOL2h2ti6Kln0…
>
> I created reviewer columns like last time. Did we just rate from 0-5
> before? I can't remember. 0-5 seems reasonable?
>
> Currently the dates for this are:
>
> - speaker notifications Jan 13
> - schedule published Jan 17
>
> I would love it if we could review these and put together a schedule
> earlier. Sooner means we can publish a schedule sooner and people will
> know what they are signing up for when they buy tickets and travel etc.
> The challenges is the holidays. I'm going to be out Dec 26 - Jan 10, but
>
> I am going to try to do my reviews before that, and I can make time for a
>
> planning call or two the first week of Jan... or we can try to start the
> discussion over email. If nothing else we can probably get the schedule
> up by the 15th (W) instead of 17th (Fri) maybe?
>
> The other thing we need to start thinking about is keynotes. We should be
>
> on the looking for talk proposals that we can simply elevate to a keynote,
>
> or think about speakers that we could invite.
>
> Currently, the PC is
>
> - Dan (CERN)
> - Josh (RH)
> - Lars (SUSE)
> - Matias (WD)
> - Neha (RH)
> - Patrick (RH)
> - Sage (RH)
>
> I asked Florian to help again and he said no. Is there anyone else we
> should invite?
>
> Thanks!
> sage
> _______________________________________________
> Cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc mailing list -- cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc(a)ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to cephalocon-seoul-2020-pc-leave(a)ceph.io
>