If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account. tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and force the -all manually, you block mostly spam.
Hi, El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió:
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and force the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com
I think banning gmail.com will be an issue for the list, at least short-term. Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :) Cheers Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/
Could we at least stop approving requests from obvious spammers? Best regards, ================= Frank Schilder AIT Risø Campus Bygning 109, rum S14 ________________________________________ From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 9:18 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail? Hi, El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió:
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and force the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com
I think banning gmail.com will be an issue for the list, at least short-term. Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :) Cheers Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
I am putting ceph-users@ceph.io on the blacklist for now. Let me know via different email address when it is resolved.
Could we at least stop approving requests from obvious spammers?
Best regards, ================= Frank Schilder AIT Risø Campus Bygning 109, rum S14
________________________________________ From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 9:18 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
Hi,
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and force
El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió: the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com
I think banning gmail.com will be an issue for the list, at least short-term.
Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :)
Cheers
Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project
Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun
https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
Is there any way to have a subscription request validated? -----Original Message----- From: Marc <Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 7:56 AM To: ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail? I am putting ceph-users@ceph.io on the blacklist for now. Let me know via different email address when it is resolved.
Could we at least stop approving requests from obvious spammers?
Best regards, ================= Frank Schilder AIT Risø Campus Bygning 109, rum S14
________________________________________ From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 9:18 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
Hi,
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and force
El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió: the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com
I think banning gmail.com will be an issue for the list, at least short-term.
Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :)
Cheers
Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project
Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun
https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
Yes. I have admin juice on some other Ceph lists, I've asked for it here as well so that I can manage with alacrity.
On Jun 17, 2024, at 09:31, Robert W. Eckert <rob@rob.eckert.name> wrote:
Is there any way to have a subscription request validated?
-----Original Message----- From: Marc <Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 7:56 AM To: ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
I am putting ceph-users@ceph.io on the blacklist for now. Let me know via different email address when it is resolved.
Could we at least stop approving requests from obvious spammers?
Best regards, ================= Frank Schilder AIT Risø Campus Bygning 109, rum S14
________________________________________ From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 9:18 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
Hi,
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and force
El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió: the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com
I think banning gmail.com will be an issue for the list, at least short-term.
Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :)
Cheers
Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project
Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun
https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
Any news on getting your admin access for this list? Spam is really bad at the moment and even though it is easily blocked by antispam, the list archives are polluted for everyone… On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 16:02, Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes. I have admin juice on some other Ceph lists, I've asked for it here as well so that I can manage with alacrity.
On Jun 17, 2024, at 09:31, Robert W. Eckert <rob@rob.eckert.name> wrote:
Is there any way to have a subscription request validated?
-----Original Message----- From: Marc <Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 7:56 AM To: ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
I am putting ceph-users@ceph.io on the blacklist for now. Let me know via different email address when it is resolved.
Could we at least stop approving requests from obvious spammers?
Best regards, ================= Frank Schilder AIT Risø Campus Bygning 109, rum S14
________________________________________ From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 9:18 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
Hi,
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and force
El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió: the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com
I think banning gmail.com will be an issue for the list, at least short-term.
Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :)
Cheers
Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project
Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun
https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
As of this morning I have teh_power. I’m working through deleting the worst of the spammers, etc.
On Jun 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Pierre Riteau <pierre@stackhpc.com> wrote:
Any news on getting your admin access for this list? Spam is really bad at the moment and even though it is easily blocked by antispam, the list archives are polluted for everyone…
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 16:02, Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@gmail.com <mailto:anthony.datri@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes. I have admin juice on some other Ceph lists, I've asked for it here as well so that I can manage with alacrity.
On Jun 17, 2024, at 09:31, Robert W. Eckert <rob@rob.eckert.name <mailto:rob@rob.eckert.name>> wrote:
Is there any way to have a subscription request validated?
-----Original Message----- From: Marc <Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu <mailto:Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu>> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 7:56 AM To: ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
I am putting ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> on the blacklist for now. Let me know via different email address when it is resolved.
Could we at least stop approving requests from obvious spammers?
Best regards, ================= Frank Schilder AIT Risø Campus Bygning 109, rum S14
________________________________________ From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es <mailto:elacunza@binovo.es>> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 9:18 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
Hi,
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com <http://gmail.com/> will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com <http://gmail.com/> and force
El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió: the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com <http://gmail.com/>
I think banning gmail.com <http://gmail.com/> will be an issue for the list, at least short-term.
Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :)
Cheers
Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project
Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es <https://www.binovo.es/> Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun
https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users-leave@ceph.io> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users-leave@ceph.io>
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users-leave@ceph.io> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users-leave@ceph.io>
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io <mailto:ceph-users-leave@ceph.io>
That is great news, thank you! On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 18:36, Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@gmail.com> wrote:
As of this morning I have teh_power. I’m working through deleting the worst of the spammers, etc.
On Jun 24, 2024, at 12:32 PM, Pierre Riteau <pierre@stackhpc.com> wrote:
Any news on getting your admin access for this list? Spam is really bad at the moment and even though it is easily blocked by antispam, the list archives are polluted for everyone…
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 16:02, Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes. I have admin juice on some other Ceph lists, I've asked for it here as well so that I can manage with alacrity.
On Jun 17, 2024, at 09:31, Robert W. Eckert <rob@rob.eckert.name> wrote:
Is there any way to have a subscription request validated?
-----Original Message----- From: Marc <Marc@f1-outsourcing.eu> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 7:56 AM To: ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
I am putting ceph-users@ceph.io on the blacklist for now. Let me know via different email address when it is resolved.
Could we at least stop approving requests from obvious spammers?
Best regards, ================= Frank Schilder AIT Risø Campus Bygning 109, rum S14
________________________________________ From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 9:18 AM To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: why not block gmail?
Hi,
El 15/6/24 a las 11:49, Marc escribió:
If you don't block gmail, gmail/google will never make an effort to clean up their shit. I don't think people with a gmail.com will mind, because this is free and get somewhere else a free account.
tip: google does not really know what part of their infrastructure is sending email so they use spf ~all. If you process gmail.com and
force
the -all manually, you block mostly spam. In May, of 111 list messages 41 (no-spam) came from gmail.com
I think banning gmail.com will be an issue for the list, at least short-term.
Applying SPF -all seems better, but not sure about how easy that would be to implement... :)
Cheers
Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project
Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun
https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
participants (6)
-
Anthony D'Atri
-
Eneko Lacunza
-
Frank Schilder
-
Marc
-
Pierre Riteau
-
Robert W. Eckert