Ceph WAL/DB disks - do they really only use 3GB, or 30Gb, or 300GB
Hi, I'm using Intel Optane disks to provide WAL/DB capacity for my Ceph cluster (which is part of Proxmox - for VM hosting). I've read that WAL/DB partitions only use either 3GB, or 30GB, or 300GB - due to the way that RocksDB works. Is this true? My current partition for WAL/DB is 145 GB - does this mean that 115Gb of that will be permanently wasted? Is this behaviour documented somewhere, or is there some background, so I can understand a bit more about how it works? Thanks, Victor
Hi Victor, that's true for Ceph releases prior to Octopus. The latter has some improvements in this area.. There is pending backport PR to fix that in Nautilus as well: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/33889 AFAIR this topic has been discussed in this mailing list multiple times. Thanks, Igor On 3/27/2020 10:56 PM, victorhooi@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Intel Optane disks to provide WAL/DB capacity for my Ceph cluster (which is part of Proxmox - for VM hosting).
I've read that WAL/DB partitions only use either 3GB, or 30GB, or 300GB - due to the way that RocksDB works.
Is this true?
My current partition for WAL/DB is 145 GB - does this mean that 115Gb of that will be permanently wasted?
Is this behaviour documented somewhere, or is there some background, so I can understand a bit more about how it works?
Thanks, Victor _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
participants (2)
-
Igor Fedotov
-
victorhooi@yahoo.com