You can ask the monitor to dump its sessions (which should expose the IPs and the release / features) you can then track down by IP those with the undesirable features/release ceph daemon mon.`hostname -s` sessions Assuming your mon is named after the short hostname, you may need to do this for every mon. Alternatively using the `ceph tell mon.* sessions` to hit every mon at once. Respectfully, *Wes Dillingham* wes@wesdillingham.com LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46 AM Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@gmail.com> wrote:
[rook@rook-ceph-tools-5ff8d58445-gkl5w .aws]$ ceph features { "mon": [ { "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", "release": "luminous", "num": 3 } ], "osd": [ { "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", "release": "luminous", "num": 600 } ], "client": [ { "features": "0x2f018fb87aa4aafe", "release": "luminous", "num": 41 }, { "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", "release": "luminous", "num": 147 } ], "mgr": [ { "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", "release": "luminous", "num": 2 } ] } [rook@rook-ceph-tools-5ff8d58445-gkl5w .aws]$
IIRC there are nuances, there are case where a client can *look* like Jewel but actually be okay.
On Dec 21, 2023, at 10:41, Simon Oosthoek <simon.oosthoek@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Our cluster is currently running quincy, and I want to set the minimal client version to luminous, to enable upmap balancer, but when I tried to, I got this:
# ceph osd set-require-min-compat-client luminous Error EPERM: cannot set require_min_compat_client to luminous: 2 connected client(s) look like jewel (missing 0x800000000000000); add --yes-i-really-mean-it to do it anyway
I think I know the most likely candidate (and I've asked them), but is there a way to find out, the way ceph seems to know?
tnx
/Simon -- I'm using my gmail.com address, because the gmail.com dmarc policy is "none", some mail servers will reject this (microsoft?) others will instead allow this when I send mail to a mailling list which has not yet been configured to send mail "on behalf of" the sender, but rather do a kind of "forward". The latter situation causes dkim/dmarc failures and the dmarc policy will be applied. see https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC for more details _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io