Hi Greg, On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 12:46 AM Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com> wrote:
Hmm, I was thinking about reflinks for the fast file clones design, but gave up on them. Needing to track individual block allocations is just too much overhead in a distributed system like Ceph.
Venky, was this on purpose?
Not really. It got tagged with that version due to a batch label that I performed 3 months ago so that the tracker shows up in various filter queries.
-Greg
On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 8:54 AM Jay <ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
I've been periodically checking on the reflink ticket[0] for a few years, and I just noticed that it's been updated with a target version of v22.0.0. Is that real? If so, is there anywhere I can read up on the implementation, plans, etc?
0 - <https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/1680>
-- Jay ceph@tsuraan.net _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
-- Cheers, Venky