Hi, I was just curious what your intentions are, not meaning to critisize it. ;-) There are different reasons why that could be a better choice. And as I already mentioned previously, you only would have stray daemons warnings if you deployed the RGWs on hosts which already have cephadm managed daemons. Thanks, Eugen Zitat von Jan Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz>:
Hello, Eugen,
Eugen Block wrote:
Janne was a bit quicker than me, so I'll skip my short instructions how to deploy it manually. But your (cephadm managed) cluster will complain about "stray daemons". There doesn't seem to be a way to deploy rgw daemons manually with the cephadm tool so it wouldn't be stray. Is there a specific reason not to use the orchestrator for rgw deployment?
I don't want to start an opinion war here :-), but the reason is more or less that I want to be able to see under the hood (at least to some degree :-). So for now I want to run a plain, non-containerized non-orchestrated setup.
Thanks all for your help, it works for me now.
-Yenya
-- | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> | | https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ GPG: 4096R/A45477D5 | We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise. --Larry Wall