Hello Eugen, Hello Joachim, @Joachim: Interesting! And you got empty PGs, too? How did you solve the problem? @Eugen: This is one of our biggest clusters and we're in the process to migrate from Nautilus to Octopus and to migrate from CentOS to Ubuntu. The cache tier pool's OSDs were still version 14 OSDs. Most of the other OSDs are version 15 already. So I tested the command: ceph-objectstore-tool --data-path /path/to/osd --op remove --pgid 3.0 --force in a test cluster environment and this worked fine. But the test scenario was not similar to our productive environment and the PG wasn't empty. I did not find a way to emulate the same situation in the test scenario, yet. Best, Malte Am 05.10.23 um 11:03 schrieb Eugen Block:
I know, I know... but since we are already using it (for years) I have to check how to remove it safely, maybe as long as we're on Pacific. ;-)
Zitat von Joachim Kraftmayer - ceph ambassador <joachim.kraftmayer@clyso.com>:
@Eugen
We have seen the same problems 8 years ago. I can only recommend never to use cache tiering in production. At Cephalocon this was part of my talk and as far as I remember cache tiering will also disappear from ceph soon.
Cache tiering has been deprecated in the Reef release as it has lacked a maintainer for a very long time. This does not mean it will be certainly removed, but we may choose to remove it without much further notice.
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/cache-tiering/
Regards, Joachim
___________________________________ ceph ambassador DACH ceph consultant since 2012
Clyso GmbH - Premier Ceph Foundation Member
Am 05.10.23 um 10:02 schrieb Eugen Block:
Which ceph version is this? I'm trying to understand how removing a pool leaves the PGs of that pool... Do you have any logs or something from when you removed the pool? We'll have to deal with a cache tier in the forseeable future as well so this is quite relevant for us as well. Maybe I'll try to reproduce it in a test cluster first. Are those SSDs exclusively for the cache tier or are they used by other pools as well? If they were used only for the cache tier you should be able to just remove them without any risk. But as I said, I'd rather try to understand before purging them.
Zitat von Malte Stroem <malte.stroem@gmail.com>:
Hello Eugen,
yes, we followed the documentation and everything worked fine. The cache is gone.
Removing the pool worked well. Everything is clean.
The PGs are empty active+clean.
Possible solutions:
1.
ceph pg {pg-id} mark_unfound_lost delete
I do not think this is the right way since it is for PGs with status unfound. But it could work also.
2.
Set the following for the three disk:
ceph osd lost {osd-id}
I am not sure how the cluster will react to this.
3.
ceph-objectstore-tool --data-path /path/to/osd --op remove --pgid 3.0 --force
Now, will the cluster accept the removed PG status?
4.
The three disks are still presented in the crush rule, class ssd, each single OSD under one host entry.
What if I remove them from crush?
Do you have a better idea, Eugen?
Best, Malte
Am 04.10.23 um 09:21 schrieb Eugen Block:
Hi,
just for clarity, you're actually talking about the cache tier as described in the docs [1]? And you followed the steps until 'ceph osd tier remove cold-storage hot-storage' successfully? And the pool has been really deleted successfully ('ceph osd pool ls detail')?
[1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/cache-tiering/#removing-a-c...
Zitat von Malte Stroem <malte.stroem@gmail.com>:
Hello,
we removed an SSD cache tier and its pool.
The PGs for the pool do still exist.
The cluster is healthy.
The PGs are empty and they reside on the cache tier pool's SSDs.
We like to take out the disks but it is not possible. The cluster sees the PGs and answers with a HEALTH_WARN.
Because of the replication of three there are still 128 PGs on three of the 24 OSDs. We were able to remove the other OSDs.
Summary:
- pool removed - 3 x 128 empty PGs still exist - 3 of 24 OSDs still exist
How is it possible to remove these empty and healthy PGs?
The only way I found was something like:
ceph pg {pg-id} mark_unfound_lost delete
Is that the right way?
Some output of:
ceph pg ls-by-osd 23
PG OBJECTS DEGRADED MISPLACED UNFOUND BYTES OMAP_BYTES* OMAP_KEYS* LOG STATE SINCE VERSION REPORTED UP ACTING SCRUB_STAMP DEEP_SCRUB_STAMP 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 27h 0'0 2627265:196316 [15,6,23]p15 [15,6,23]p15 2023-09-28T12:41:52.982955+0200 2023-09-27T06:48:23.265838+0200 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 9h 0'0 2627266:19330 [6,23,15]p6 [6,23,15]p6 2023-09-29T06:30:57.630016+0200 2023-09-27T22:58:21.992451+0200 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 2h 0'0 2627265:1135185 [23,15,6]p23 [23,15,6]p23 2023-09-29T13:42:07.346658+0200 2023-09-24T14:31:52.844427+0200 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 13h 0'0 2627266:193170 [6,15,23]p6 [6,15,23]p6 2023-09-29T01:56:54.517337+0200 2023-09-27T17:47:24.961279+0200 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 14h 0'0 2627265:2343551 [23,6,15]p23 [23,6,15]p23 2023-09-29T00:47:47.548860+0200 2023-09-25T09:39:51.259304+0200 3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 2h 0'0 2627265:194111 [15,6,23]p15 [15,6,23]p15 2023-09-29T13:28:48.879959+0200 2023-09-26T15:35:44.217302+0200 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 6h 0'0 2627265:2345717 [23,15,6]p23 [23,15,6]p23 2023-09-29T09:26:02.534825+0200 2023-09-27T21:56:57.500126+0200
Best regards, Malte _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io