Hi Yuval, Playing with Lua, I faced similar issue. It would be perfect if you can backport this fix to Quincy. Thank you! Vladimir. -----Original Message----- From: Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshit@redhat.com> To: Ondřej Kukla <ondrej@kuuk.la> Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: RGW Lua - cancel request Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 21:00:21 +0300 Hi Ondřej, Greater to hear that you use lua. You are right, this field has become writable only in reef. I can backport the fix to quincy, so that you can use it in the next quincy release (not sure when it is). A better option would be to allow setting the failure from lua - but this would be a new feature, that would probably land post reef. Yuval On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 7:49 PM Ondřej Kukla <ondrej@kuuk.la> wrote:
Hello,
Lately I’ve been playing with Lua scripting on top of RGW.
I would like to implement a request blocking based on bucket name -> when there is a dot in a bucket name return error code and a message that this name is invalid.
Here is the code I was able to came up with.
if string.find(Request.HTTP.URI, '%.') then Request.Response.HTTPStatusCode = 400 Request.Response.HTTPStatus = “InvalidBucketName" Request.Response.Message = “Dots in bucket name are not allowed." end
This works fine, but the request for creating a bucket would be processed and the bucket will be created. I thought about a dirty workaround with setting the Request.Bucket.Name to a bucket that already exists but it seems that this field is not writable in Quincy.
Is there a way to block the request from processing?
Any help is much appreciated.
Kind regards,
Ondrej _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io