Hello, Ceph users,
Lars Täuber wrote:
: +1 from me
:
: I also hope for a bare metal solution for the upcoming versions. At the moment it is a
show stopper for an upgrade to Octopus.
Also +1. Not having a unix-style deployment tool is a show-stopper for me
as well. So far I keep my servers on Nautilus for this reason.
-Yenya
: Am Fri, 3 Jul 2020 20:44:02 +0200
: schrieb Oliver Freyermuth <freyermuth(a)physik.uni-bonn.de>de>:
:
: > Of course, no solution ever is perfect, but I really believe a classic
"unix-style" solution (i.e. being modular) which can be combined with others
: > is essential for any project.
: > If there are only full-fledged "all-in-one" solutions such as Ansible or
container orchestration, this may be good for many cases,
: > but can never cover all user requirements, since it can't be integrated into
existing workflows and infrastructures as well as a lightweight module
: > I can either use in full or only use parts of. To me, that's part of the Open
Source freedom.
: >
: > Cheers,
: > Oliver
:
:
:
: --
: Informationstechnologie
: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften
: Jägerstraße 22-23 10117 Berlin
: Tel.: +49 30 20370-352
http://www.bbaw.de
: _______________________________________________
: ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
: To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io
--
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work |
yenya.net - private}>
|
|
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ GPG: 4096R/A45477D5 |
IORING_OP_NOP ... the benefits of doing nothing asynchronously are minimal,
but sometimes a placeholder is useful. --Jonathan Corbet at LWN