+1. If I know radosgw on top of cephfs is a thing, I may change some plans. Is that the planned route? Thanks, Kevin ________________________________________ From: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@redhat.com> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 6:21 AM To: Kai Stian Olstad Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: s3 compatible interface Check twice before you click! This email originated from outside PNNL. On 3/3/23 13:53, Kai Stian Olstad wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 08:39:56AM -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
We're actually writing this for RGW right now. It'll be a bit before it's productized, but it's in the works.
Just curious, what is the use cases for this feature? S3 against CephFS?
Local FS for development use, and distributed FS (initial target is GPFS) for production. There's no current plans to make it work against CephFS, although I would imagine it will work fine. But if you have a Ceph cluster, you're much better off using standard RGW on RADOS. Daniel _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io