[ceph-users] Re: Consul as load balancer

Good to know thank you. Why I'm thinking on consul, the user would just request the endpoint from consul, so I can remove the single load balancer bottleneck, they would go directly to rgw. ________________________________ From: Janne Johansson &lt;icepic.dz(a)gmail.com&gt; Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 1:52 PM To: Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) Cc: ceph-users(a)ceph.io Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Consul as load balancer Email received from outside the company. If in doubt don't click links nor open attachments! ________________________________ Den tis 6 okt. 2020 kl 08:37 skrev Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) <Istvan.Szabo@agoda.com<mailto:Istvan.Szabo@agoda.com>>: For rgw, load balancing is quite simple, and I guess almost any LB would work. The only major thing we have hit is that for AWS4 auth, you need to make sure that the requests to the backends* actually use the hostname sent by the client, but apart from that, I can't think of a LB that can handle http(s) that would not work for S3/RGW. *) some LBs, when they see a pool of backends as a list of ips like 10.1.2.1, 10.1.2.2, 10.1.2.3 will make the inner request against http://10.1.2.3:80 instead of http://mybucket.s3.example.com and since the request hostname is a part of the hash used for auth, the rgw will calculate it against 10.1.2.3 but the client will of course use mybucket.s3.example.com<http://mybucket.s3.example.com>. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. ________________________________ This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by copyright or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to copy this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by any mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the message. All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the company's interests and to remove potential malware. Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost or deleted, or contain viruses.