Hi, That's right! We're currently evaluating a similar setup with two identical HW nodes (on two different sites), with OSD, MON and MDS each, and both nodes have CephFS mounted. The goal is to build a minimal self-contained shared filesystem that remains online during planned updates and can somehow survive should disaster strike at one of the two sites. We added a third node (a small VM) running only a monitor to avoid exactly the described problem. Best, Christoph On 15/06/2021 15.32, Robert Sander wrote:
On 15.06.21 15:16, nORKy wrote:
Why is there no failover ??
Because only one MON out of two is not in the majority to build a quorum.
Regards
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
-- Dr. Christoph Brüning Universität Würzburg HPC & DataManagement @ ct.qmat & RZUW Am Hubland D-97074 Würzburg Tel.: +49 931 31-80499