Thanks a lot for this spreadsheet, I’ll check that on but I doubt we store
data smaller than the min_alloc size.
Yes we do use an EC pool type of 2+1 with failure_domain being at host
level.
Le mar. 14 mars 2023 à 19:38, Mark Nelson <mark.a.nelson(a)gmail.com> a
écrit :
Is it possible that you are storing object (chunks if
EC) that are
smaller than the min_alloc size? This cheat sheet might help:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rpGfScgG-GLoIGMJWDixEkqs-On9w8nAUTo…
Mark
On 3/14/23 12:34, Gaël THEROND wrote:
Hi everyone, I’ve got a quick question regarding
one of our RadosGW
bucket.
This bucket is used to store docker registries, and the total amount of
data we use is supposed to be 4.5Tb BUT it looks like ceph told us we
rather use ~53Tb of data.
One interesting thing is, this bucket seems to shard for unknown reason
as
it is supposed to be disabled by default, but
even taking that into
account
we’re not supposed to see such a massive amount
of additional data isn’t
it?
Here is the bucket stats of it:
https://paste.opendev.org/show/bdWFRvNFtxyHnbPfXWu9/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io