Thanks a lot for this spreadsheet, I’ll check that on but I doubt we store data smaller than the min_alloc size. Yes we do use an EC pool type of 2+1 with failure_domain being at host level. Le mar. 14 mars 2023 à 19:38, Mark Nelson <mark.a.nelson@gmail.com> a écrit :
Is it possible that you are storing object (chunks if EC) that are smaller than the min_alloc size? This cheat sheet might help:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rpGfScgG-GLoIGMJWDixEkqs-On9w8nAUToP...
Mark
On 3/14/23 12:34, Gaël THEROND wrote:
Hi everyone, I’ve got a quick question regarding one of our RadosGW bucket.
This bucket is used to store docker registries, and the total amount of data we use is supposed to be 4.5Tb BUT it looks like ceph told us we rather use ~53Tb of data.
One interesting thing is, this bucket seems to shard for unknown reason as it is supposed to be disabled by default, but even taking that into account we’re not supposed to see such a massive amount of additional data isn’t it?
Here is the bucket stats of it: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bdWFRvNFtxyHnbPfXWu9/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io