- The head object had a size of 0.
- There was an object with a ’shadow’ in its name, belonging to that path.
That is
normal. What is not normal is if there are NO shadow objects.
On 18/11/2020 10:06, Denis Krienbühl wrote:
> It looks like a single-part object. But we did replace that object last night from
backup, so I can’t know for sure if the lost one was like that.
>
> Another engineer that looked at the Rados objects last night did notice two things:
>
- The head object had a size of 0.
- There was an object with a ’shadow’ in its name, belonging to that path.
>
> I’m not knowledgable about Rados, so I’m not sure this is helpful.
>
>> On 18 Nov 2020, at 10:01, Janek Bevendorff <janek.bevendorff(a)uni-weimar.de>
wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, it's radosgw-admin object stat --bucket=BUCKETNAME --object=OBJECTNAME
(forgot the "object" there)
>>
>> On 18/11/2020 09:58, Janek Bevendorff wrote:
>>>> The object, a Docker layer, that went missing has not been touched in 2
months. It worked for a while, but then suddenly went missing.
>>> Was the object a multipart object? You can check by running radosgw-admin
stat --bucket=BUCKETNAME --object=OBJECTNAME. It should say something "ns":
"multipart" in the output. If it says "ns": "shadow",
it's a single-part object.
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
>> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io