Because some users won't trust tools that have limited or no human oversight. Having a repository that is written by "AI" with one single large commit calls into question * the maintainability of the code * the understanding of the author of the code * the longevity of the project * the safety If the software was read only it _could_ be ok, but I would never give a vibe coded piece of software that I didn't read completely access to my cluster. If a human maintains a piece of software I can look at the commit history, understand the design, be reasonable sure to follow the code and could in theory follow the development. LLM code-dumps that span thousands of lines and aren't even completely shown in the github diff view are a nightmare. Oh and I find it intransparent and questionable if someone isn't open about using AI. If a project is transparent about it's usage I'm more willing to give them the benefit of the doubt as if they don't mention it at all. Kind regards, Thomas On 2026-07-13 16:43, Anthony D'Atri wrote:
Why does that matter?
On Jul 13, 2026, at 10:41 AM, Thomas Schneider via ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote: Looking at the README and "commit history" this kind of screams vibe coded which turns me off from even trying to use it tbh. If you used LLMs you should be transparent about it.
-- Thomas Schneider IT.SERVICES Wissenschaftliche Informationsversorgung Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum Telefon: +49 234 32 23939 http://www.it-services.rub.de/