"A containerized environment just makes troubleshooting more difficult, getting
access and retrieving details on Ceph processes isn't as straightforward as with a non
containerized infrastructure. I am still not convinced that containerizing everything
brings any benefits except the collocation of services."
It changes the way you troubleshoot, but I don't find it more difficult in the issues
I have seen and had. Even today without containers, all services can be co-located within
the same hosts (mons,mgrs,osds,mds).. Is there a situation you've seen where that has
not been the case?
________________________________
From: Teoman Onay <tonay(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 1:38 PM
To: Matthew H <matthew.heler(a)hotmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Vernon <mv3(a)sanger.ac.uk>uk>; ceph-users <ceph-users(a)ceph.io>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: ceph-ansible in Pacific and beyond?
A containerized environment just makes troubleshooting more difficult, getting access and
retrieving details on Ceph processes isn't as straightforward as with a non
containerized infrastructure. I am still not convinced that containerizing everything
brings any benefits except the collocation of services.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 6:27 PM Matthew H
<matthew.heler@hotmail.com<mailto:matthew.heler@hotmail.com>> wrote:
There should not be any performance difference between an un-containerized version and a
containerized one.
The shift to containers makes sense, as this is the general direction that the industry as
a whole is taking. I would suggest giving cephadm a try, it's relatively straight
forward and significantly faster for deployments then ceph-ansible is.
________________________________
From: Matthew Vernon <mv3@sanger.ac.uk<mailto:mv3@sanger.ac.uk>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:50 PM
To: ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>>
Subject: [ceph-users] ceph-ansible in Pacific and beyond?
Hi,
I caught up with Sage's talk on what to expect in Pacific (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVtn53MbxTc ) and there was no mention
of ceph-ansible at all.
Is it going to continue to be supported? We use it (and uncontainerised
packages) for all our clusters, so I'd be a bit alarmed if it was going
to go away...
Regards,
Matthew
--
The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to
ceph-users-leave@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users-leave@ceph.io>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to
ceph-users-leave@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users-leave@ceph.io>