Thank you, Tyler. Unfortunately (or fortunately?) the drive is fine in this case: there were no errors reported by the kernel at the time, and I successfully managed to run a bunch of tests on the drive for many hours before rebooting the host. The drive has worked without any issues for 3 days now. I've already checked the file descriptor numbers, the defaults already are very high and the usage is rather low. /Z On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 03:24, Tyler Stachecki <stachecki.tyler@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:13 AM Zakhar Kirpichenko <zakhar@gmail.com> wrote:
Any input from anyone?
/Z
IIt's not clear whether or not these issues are related. I see three things in this e-mail chain: 1) bdev() _aio_thread with EPERM, as in the subject of this e-mail chain 2) bdev() _aio_thread with the I/O error condition (see [1], which is a *slightly* different if/else switch than the EPERM) 3) The tracker, which seems related to BlueFS (?): https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53906
Shooting in a dark a bit... but for the EPERM issue you mention, maybe try raising the number of file descriptors available to the process/container/system? Not sure why else would you get EPERM in this context.
On 2) I have definitely seen that happen before and it's always matched with an I/O error reported by the kernel in `dmesg` output. Sometimes the drive keeps going along fine after a restart of the OSD/reboot of the system, sometimes not.
Cheers, Tyler
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:52, Zakhar Kirpichenko <zakhar@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
Just to reiterate, I'm referring to an OSD crash loop because of the following error:
"2023-12-03T04:00:36.686+0000 7f08520e2700 -1 bdev(0x55f02a28a400 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-56/block) _aio_thread got r=-1 ((1) Operation
not
permitted)". More relevant log entries: https://pastebin.com/gDat6rfk
The crash log suggested that there could be a hardware issue but there was none, I was able to access the block device for testing purposes without any issues, and the problem went away after I rebooted the host, this OSD is currently operating without any issues under load.
Any ideas?
/Z
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 16:09, Zakhar Kirpichenko <zakhar@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks! The bug I referenced is the reason for the 1st OSD crash, but not for the subsequent crashes. The reason for those is described where you <snip />. I'm asking for help with that one.
/Z
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 15:31, Kai Stian Olstad <ceph+list@olstad.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 06:53:08AM +0200, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote:
One of our 16.2.14 cluster OSDs crashed again because of the dreaded https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53906 bug.
<snip />
It would be good to understand what has triggered this condition and how it can be resolved without rebooting the whole host. I would very much appreciate any suggestions.
If you look closely at 53906 you'll see it's a duplicate of https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53907
In there you have the fix and a workaround until next minor is released.
-- Kai Stian Olstad
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io