18 Nov
2023
18 Nov
'23
8:28 a.m.
Le 17/11/2023 à 11:23:49+0100, David C. a écrit Hi,
5 instead of 3 mon will allow you to limit the impact if you break a mon (for example, with the file system full)
5 instead of 3 MDS, this makes sense if the workload can be distributed over several trees in your file system. Sometimes it can also make sense to have several FSs in order to limit the consequences of an infrastructure with several active MDSs.
So no disadvantage to have 5 instead of 3 ?
Concerning performance, if you see a node that is too busy which impacts the cluster, you can always think about relocating certain services.
Ok, thanks for the answer. Regards. -- Albert SHIH 🦫 🐸 Observatoire de Paris France Heure locale/Local time: sam. 18 nov. 2023 09:26:56 CET