Hi, on the error log of my active MGR I find these errors after some time: 2019-11-02 19:07:30.629 7f448f1cb700 0 auth: could not find secret_id=3769 2019-11-02 19:07:30.629 7f448f1cb700 0 cephx: verify_authorizer could not get service secret for service mgr secret_id=3769 2019-11-02 19:07:30.821 7f448f1cb700 0 auth: could not find secret_id=3768 2019-11-02 19:07:30.821 7f448f1cb700 0 cephx: verify_authorizer could not get service secret for service mgr secret_id=3768 2019-11-02 19:07:31.597 7f448f1cb700 0 auth: could not find secret_id=3768 2019-11-02 19:07:31.597 7f448f1cb700 0 cephx: verify_authorizer could not get service secret for service mgr secret_id=3768 Once these errors occur the MGR is not working, means there's no PG activity in ceph -s although the cluster health status is HEALTH_ERR. Regards Thomas Am 02.11.2019 um 17:38 schrieb Oliver Freyermuth:
Dear Sage,
at least for the simple case: ceph device get-health-metrics osd.11 => mgr crashes (but in that case, it crashes fully, i.e. the process is gone) I have now uploaded a verbose log as: ceph-post-file: e3bd60ad-cbce-4308-8b07-7ebe7998572e
One potential cause of this (and maybe the other issues) might be because some of our OSDs are on non-JBOD controllers and hence are made by forming a Raid 0 per disk, so a simple smartctl on the device will not work (but -dmegaraid,<number> would be needed).
Now I have both mgrs active again, debug logging on, device health metrics on again, and am waiting for them to become silent again. Let's hope the issue reappears before the disks run full of logs ;-).
Cheers, Oliver
Am 02.11.19 um 02:56 schrieb Sage Weil:
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019, Oliver Freyermuth wrote:
Dear Cephers,
interestingly, after: ceph device monitoring off the mgrs seem to be stable now - the active one still went silent a few minutes later, but the standby took over and was stable, and restarting the broken one, it's now stable since an hour, too, so probably, a restart of the mgr is needed after disabling device monitoring to get things stable again.
So it seems to be caused by a problem with the device health metrics. In case this is a red herring and mgrs become instable again in the next days, I'll let you know. If this seems to stabilize things, and you can tolerate inducing the failure again, reproducing the problem with mgr logs cranked up (debug_mgr = 20, debug_ms = 1) would probably give us a good idea of why the mgr is hanging. Let us know!
Thanks, sage
Cheers, Oliver
Am 01.11.19 um 23:09 schrieb Oliver Freyermuth:
Dear Cephers,
this is a 14.2.4 cluster with device health metrics enabled - since about a day, all mgr daemons go "silent" on me after a few hours, i.e. "ceph -s" shows:
cluster: id: 269cf2b2-7e7c-4ceb-bd1b-a33d915ceee9 health: HEALTH_WARN no active mgr 1/3 mons down, quorum mon001,mon002
services: mon: 3 daemons, quorum mon001,mon002 (age 57m), out of quorum: mon003 mgr: no daemons active (since 56m) ... (the third mon has a planned outage and will come back in a few days)
Checking the logs of the mgr daemons, I find some "reset" messages at the time when it goes "silent", first for the first mgr:
2019-11-01 21:34:40.286 7f2df6a6b700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : pgmap v1798: 1585 pgs: 1585 active+clean; 1.1 TiB data, 2.3 TiB used, 136 TiB / 138 TiB avail 2019-11-01 21:34:41.458 7f2e0d59b700 0 client.0 ms_handle_reset on v2:10.160.16.1:6800/401248 2019-11-01 21:34:42.287 7f2df6a6b700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : pgmap v1799: 1585 pgs: 1585 active+clean; 1.1 TiB data, 2.3 TiB used, 136 TiB / 138 TiB avail
and a bit later, on the standby mgr:
2019-11-01 22:18:14.892 7f7bcc8ae700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : pgmap v1798: 1585 pgs: 166 active+clean+snaptrim, 858 active+clean+snaptrim_wait, 561 active+clean; 1.1 TiB data, 2.3 TiB used, 136 TiB / 138 TiB avail 2019-11-01 22:18:16.022 7f7be9e72700 0 client.0 ms_handle_reset on v2:10.160.16.2:6800/352196 2019-11-01 22:18:16.893 7f7bcc8ae700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : pgmap v1799: 1585 pgs: 166 active+clean+snaptrim, 858 active+clean+snaptrim_wait, 561 active+clean; 1.1 TiB data, 2.3 TiB used, 136 TiB / 138 TiB avail
Interestingly, the dashboard still works, but presents outdated information, and for example zero I/O going on. I believe this started to happen mainly after the third mon went into the known downtime, but I am not fully sure if this was the trigger, since the cluster is still growing. It may also have been the addition of 24 more OSDs.
I also find other messages in the mgr logs which seem problematic, but I am not sure they are related: ------------------------------ 2019-11-01 21:17:09.849 7f2df4266700 0 mgr[devicehealth] Error reading OMAP: [errno 22] Failed to operate read op for oid Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/devicehealth/module.py", line 396, in put_device_metrics ioctx.operate_read_op(op, devid) File "rados.pyx", line 516, in rados.requires.wrapper.validate_func (/home/jenkins-build/build/workspace/ceph-build/ARCH/x86_64/AVAILABLE_ARCH/x86_64/AVAILABLE_DIST/centos7/DIST/centos7/MACHINE_SIZE/huge/release/14.2.4/rpm/el7/BUIL D/ceph-14.2.4/build/src/pybind/rados/pyrex/rados.c:4721) File "rados.pyx", line 3474, in rados.Ioctx.operate_read_op (/home/jenkins-build/build/workspace/ceph-build/ARCH/x86_64/AVAILABLE_ARCH/x86_64/AVAILABLE_DIST/centos7/DIST/centos7/MACHINE_SIZE/huge/release/14.2.4/rpm/el7/BUILD/ceph-14.2.4/build/src/pybind/rados/pyrex/rados.c:36554) InvalidArgumentError: [errno 22] Failed to operate read op for oid ------------------------------ or: ------------------------------ 2019-11-01 21:33:53.977 7f7bd38bc700 0 mgr[devicehealth] Fail to parse JSON result from daemon osd.51 () 2019-11-01 21:33:53.978 7f7bd38bc700 0 mgr[devicehealth] Fail to parse JSON result from daemon osd.52 () 2019-11-01 21:33:53.979 7f7bd38bc700 0 mgr[devicehealth] Fail to parse JSON result from daemon osd.53 () ------------------------------
The reason why I am cautious about the health metrics is that I observed a crash when trying to query them: ------------------------------ 2019-11-01 20:21:23.661 7fa46314a700 0 log_channel(audit) log [DBG] : from='client.174136 -' entity='client.admin' cmd=[{"prefix": "device get-health-metrics", "devid": "osd.11", "target": ["mgr", ""]}]: dispatch 2019-11-01 20:21:23.661 7fa46394b700 0 mgr[devicehealth] handle_command 2019-11-01 20:21:23.663 7fa46394b700 -1 *** Caught signal (Segmentation fault) ** in thread 7fa46394b700 thread_name:mgr-fin
ceph version 14.2.4 (75f4de193b3ea58512f204623e6c5a16e6c1e1ba) nautilus (stable) 1: (()+0xf5f0) [0x7fa488cee5f0] 2: (PyEval_EvalFrameEx()+0x1a9) [0x7fa48aeb50f9] 3: (PyEval_EvalFrameEx()+0x67bd) [0x7fa48aebb70d] 4: (PyEval_EvalFrameEx()+0x67bd) [0x7fa48aebb70d] 5: (PyEval_EvalFrameEx()+0x67bd) [0x7fa48aebb70d] 6: (PyEval_EvalCodeEx()+0x7ed) [0x7fa48aebe08d] 7: (()+0x709c8) [0x7fa48ae479c8] 8: (PyObject_Call()+0x43) [0x7fa48ae22ab3] 9: (()+0x5aaa5) [0x7fa48ae31aa5] 10: (PyObject_Call()+0x43) [0x7fa48ae22ab3] 11: (()+0x4bb95) [0x7fa48ae22b95] 12: (PyObject_CallMethod()+0xbb) [0x7fa48ae22ecb] 13: (ActivePyModule::handle_command(std::map<std::string, boost::variant<std::string, bool, long, double, std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string> >, std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> >, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > >, std::less<void>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, boost::variant<std::string, bool, long, double, std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string> >, std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> >, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > > const&, ceph::buffer::v14_2_0::list const&, std::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*, std::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*)+0x20e) [0x55c3c1fefc5e] 14: (()+0x16c23d) [0x55c3c204023d] 15: (FunctionContext::finish(int)+0x2c) [0x55c3c2001eac] 16: (Context::complete(int)+0x9) [0x55c3c1ffe659] 17: (Finisher::finisher_thread_entry()+0x156) [0x7fa48b439cc6] 18: (()+0x7e65) [0x7fa488ce6e65] 19: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fa48799488d] NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to interpret this. ------------------------------
I have issued: ceph device monitoring off for now and will keep waiting to see if mgrs go silent again. If there are any better ideas or this issue is known, let me know.
Cheers, Oliver
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io