unsubscribe ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <ceph-users-request@ceph.io> Date: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 7:22 PM Subject: ceph-users Digest, Vol 80, Issue 54 To: <ceph-users@ceph.io> Send ceph-users mailing list submissions to ceph-users@ceph.io To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ceph-users-request@ceph.io You can reach the person managing the list at ceph-users-owner@ceph.io When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ceph-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: upmap supported in SLES 12SPx (Ilya Dryomov) 2. Re: upmap supported in SLES 12SPx (Thomas Schneider) 3. Re: upmap supported in SLES 12SPx (Ilya Dryomov) 4. Re: Using same instance name for rgw (Eric Choi) 5. Re: RGW Passthrough (Casey Bodley) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:56:19 +0200 From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: upmap supported in SLES 12SPx To: Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com> Cc: Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@k0ste.ru>, ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Message-ID: <CAOi1vP-YzuMeL-u=hPDMr6fSTWd+F7RXX61kfO9609pxv98qNw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:40 PM Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your valuable input.
Question: Can I get more information of the 6 clients (those with features 0x40106b84a842a42), e.g. IP, that allows me to identify it easily?
Yes, although it's not integrated into "ceph features". Log into a monitor node and run "ceph daemon mon.a sessions" (mon.a is the name of the monitor, substitute accordingly). Thanks, Ilya ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:10:37 +0200 From: Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: upmap supported in SLES 12SPx To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Cc: Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@k0ste.ru>, ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Message-ID: <79b342ac-be00-e3e7-cbec-b6c96d3a0a59@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Wonderbra. I found some relevant sessions on 2 of 3 monitor nodes. And I found some others: root@ld5505:~# ceph daemon mon.ld5505 sessions | grep 0x40106b84a842a42 root@ld5505:~# ceph daemon mon.ld5505 sessions | grep -v luminous [ "MonSession(client.32679861 v1:10.97.206.92:0/1183647891 is open allow *, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.32692978 v1:10.97.206.91:0/3689092992 is open allow *, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.11935413 v1:10.96.6.116:0/3187655474 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.3941901 v1:10.76.179.23:0/2967896845 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.28313343 v1:10.76.177.108:0/1303617860 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.29311725 v1:10.97.206.94:0/224438037 is open allow *, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.4535833 v1:10.76.177.133:0/1269608815 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.3919902 v1:10.96.4.243:0/293623521 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.35678944 v1:10.76.179.211:0/4218086982 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.35751316 v1:10.76.179.30:0/1348696702 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.28246527 v1:10.96.4.228:0/1495661381 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.3917843 v1:10.76.179.22:0/489863209 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(unknown.0 - is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", ] Would it make sense to shutdown these clients, too? What confuses me is that the list includes clients that belong to the Ceph cluster, namely 10.97.206.0/24. All nodes of the Ceph cluster are identical in terms of OS, kernel, Ceph. Regards Thomas Am 16.09.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:40 PM Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your valuable input.
Question: Can I get more information of the 6 clients (those with features 0x40106b84a842a42), e.g. IP, that allows me to identify it easily? Yes, although it's not integrated into "ceph features". Log into a monitor node and run "ceph daemon mon.a sessions" (mon.a is the name of the monitor, substitute accordingly).
Thanks,
Ilya
------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:36:35 +0200 From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: upmap supported in SLES 12SPx To: Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com> Cc: Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@k0ste.ru>, ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9MsfoQFPNfUYPRn2MzS=5buZ-s2Jcorkym84K8hJ6cWw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:10 PM Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com> wrote:
Wonderbra.
I found some relevant sessions on 2 of 3 monitor nodes. And I found some others: root@ld5505:~# ceph daemon mon.ld5505 sessions | grep 0x40106b84a842a42 root@ld5505:~# ceph daemon mon.ld5505 sessions | grep -v luminous [ "MonSession(client.32679861 v1:10.97.206.92:0/1183647891 is open allow *, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.32692978 v1:10.97.206.91:0/3689092992 is open allow *, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.11935413 v1:10.96.6.116:0/3187655474 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.3941901 v1:10.76.179.23:0/2967896845 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.28313343 v1:10.76.177.108:0/1303617860 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.29311725 v1:10.97.206.94:0/224438037 is open allow *, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.4535833 v1:10.76.177.133:0/1269608815 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.3919902 v1:10.96.4.243:0/293623521 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.35678944 v1:10.76.179.211:0/4218086982 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.35751316 v1:10.76.179.30:0/1348696702 is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", "MonSession(client.28246527 v1:10.96.4.228:0/1495661381 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(client.3917843 v1:10.76.179.22:0/489863209 is open allow r, features 0x27018fb86aa42ada (jewel))", "MonSession(unknown.0 - is open allow r, features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 (jewel))", ]
Would it make sense to shutdown these clients, too?
What confuses me is that the list includes clients that belong to the Ceph cluster, namely 10.97.206.0/24. All nodes of the Ceph cluster are identical in terms of OS, kernel, Ceph.
The above output seems consistent with your "ceph features" output: it lists clients with features 0x27018eb84aa42a52 and 0x27018fb86aa42ada. Like I said in my previous email, both of these support upmap. If you temporarily shut them down, set-require-min-compat-client will work without --yes-i-really-mean-it. Thanks, Ilya ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:05:47 -0000 From: "Eric Choi" <eric.yongjun.choi@gmail.com> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Using same instance name for rgw To: ceph-users@ceph.io Message-ID: <156864994756.18.7543223789861447910@mailman-web> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" bump. anyone? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:22:16 -0400 From: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: RGW Passthrough To: ceph-users@ceph.io Message-ID: <fdf93930-794e-b2d0-46ee-5288a4d91605@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Hi Robert, So far the cloud tiering features are still in the design stages. We're working on some initial refactoring work to support this abstraction (ie. to either satisfy a request against the local rados cluster, or to proxy it somewhere else). With respect to passthrough/tiering to AWS, we could use help thinking through the user/credential mapping in particular. We have a weekly 'RGW Refactoring' meeting on Wednesdays where we discuss design and refactoring progress - it's on the upstream community calendar, I'll send you an invite. On 9/13/19 9:59 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
We are very interested in the RGW Passthrough mentioned for Octupus. What's the status and how can we help? We want to connect with AWS S3.
Thank you, ---------------- Robert LeBlanc PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s ------------------------------ End of ceph-users Digest, Vol 80, Issue 54 ******************************************