On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 5:42 AM Oliver Freyermuth
<freyermuth(a)physik.uni-bonn.de> wrote:
Hi together,
I had a look at ceph-fuse code and if I read it correctly, it does indeed not seem to
have the relatime behaviour since kernels 2.6.30 implemented.
Should I open a ticket on this?
Cheers,
Oliver
Am 02.12.19 um 14:31 schrieb Oliver Freyermuth:
I was thinking about the behaviour of relatime on
kernels since 2.6.30 (quoting mount(8)):
--------------------
"Update inode access times relative to modify or change time. Access time is only
updated if the previous access time was earlier than the current modify or change time.
(Similar to
noatime, but it doesn't break mutt or other applications that need to know if a file
has been read since the last time it was modified.)
Since Linux 2.6.30, the kernel defaults to the behavior provided by this option (unless
noatime was specified),
and the strictatime option is required to obtain traditional semantics. In addition,
since
Linux 2.6.30, the file's last access time is always updated if it is more than 1 day
old."
--------------------
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io