2 May
2023
2 May
'23
1:32 a.m.
Hi Yixin,
This sounds interesting. I kind of suspect that this feature requires some
more conceptual design support. Like, at a high level, how a bucket's
"zone residency" might be defined and specified, and what policies might
govern changing it, not to mention, how you direct things (commands? ops?).
This might be something to bring to an RGW upstream call (the "refactoring"
meeting), Wednesdays at 11:30 EST.
Matt
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:27 PM Yixin Jin <yjin77(a)yahoo.ca> wrote:
Hi folks,
Armed with bucket-specific sync policy feature, I found that we could move
objects of a bucket between zones. It is migration via sync followed by
object removal at the source. This allows us to better utilize available
capacities in different clusters/zones. However, to achieve this, we need a
way to reset an empty bucket so that it can serve as a destination for a
migration after it serves as a source before. ceph/rgw currently doesn't
seem to be able to do that. So I create a feature request for it
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59593
My own prototype shows that this feature is fairly simply to implement and
works well for bucket migration.
Cheers,
Yixin
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave(a)ceph.io
--
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage
tel. 734-821-5101
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309