Hi,
* Ceph users will benefit from both approaches being
supported into the future
this is rather important for us as well.
we use systemd-nspawn based containers (that act and are managed like
traditional VMs, just without the overhead).
cephadm enforces not just containers, but particular ones (granted,
docker/podman are the currently most used container-runtimes).
it would be nice if cephadm would, like cephdeploy did, support
"traditional"/plain systems (which then automatically works perfectly
for us with systemd-nspawn without any changes).
until now we've still used ceph-deply and stayed away from cephadm, as
it would require us to completely change our system deployment.
Regards,
Daniel