Hi again! I've found an open issue at ZFS and there are some good informations: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/3324 For example max_recordsize=4M very helps due to Ceph recordsize. I was getting 30-50MiB/s with fio %50 RW now I can reach 200MiBs that's good but still not good as I expected. RBD disk easily reaches %100 utilization and stays there even write operation is done. But at the beginning I was have 100++ async_write pending operations, with these zfs tunes that's mostly zero now and Utilization decreases quickly. options zfs zfs_vdev_max_active=40000 options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_read_max_active=100 options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_read_min_active=100 options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_write_max_active=100 options zfs zfs_vdev_sync_write_min_active=100 options zfs zfs_vdev_async_read_max_active=20000 options zfs zfs_vdev_async_read_min_active=10 options zfs zfs_vdev_async_write_max_active=20000 options zfs zfs_vdev_async_write_min_active=10 options zfs zfs_max_recordsize=4194304 options zfs zfs_vdev_aggregation_limit=4194304 These tunings messed up with 4K speed. It's just terrible. I think it's possible to reach 500MiB/s with more tunings at both sides, RBD+ZFS. I've started with the ZFS, Do you have any advice for RBD tunings? What do you think about zfs raid0 pool with 2 or 4 rbd disk ? mhnx <morphinwithyou@gmail.com>, 5 Haz 2021 Cmt, 16:30 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
Hello.
I'm using rbd disks for zfs and on the zfs I use NFS. I see 10-50MB/s top. When I use the rbd disk in the VM environment it can reach 1GB/s RW so there is nothing wrong with the rbd and the cluster. Also I'm sure about ZFS+NFS performance when zfs on the real device. But when they work together I can't get even %10 performance. I think something is wrong, it shouldn't be that bad.
Ceph version: Nautilus 14.2.16 RBD Data = EC Pool RBD Metadata = SSD replicated zpool create $testpool rbd0 exportfs /testpool
Is there anyone who has tried it before?