Hi Frank, Patrick, I tried to create a cephfs elsewhere and got the warning, that's what got my attention. Nothing is broken, but I thought it could have impact on performance. Very good to know it's not that bad! Thanks!! Kenneth On 07/05/2020 23:31, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 5:56 AM Kenneth Waegeman <kenneth.waegeman@ugent.be> wrote:
I read in some release notes it is recommended to have your default data pool replicated and use erasure coded pools as additional pools through layouts. We have still a cephfs with +-1PB usage with a EC default pool. Is there a way to change the default pool or some other kind of migration without having to recreate the FS? Not until something like [1] is implemented.
If it's not broken for you, don't fix it.