Yes thanks, that gives at least a 200 OK without xml. However I am still getting these. 7f011d796700 1 ====== req done req=0x562a2a7f85f0 op status=0 http_status=200 latency=0s ====== 7f7c2342a700 1 ====== starting new request req=0x55c6307765f0 ===== 7f7c2342a700 1 ====== req done req=0x55c6307765f0 op status=0 http_status=200 latency=0s ====== 7f0192499700 0 WARNING: RGWRados::log_usage(): user name empty (bucket=), skipping 7f7cc117f700 0 WARNING: RGWRados::log_usage(): user name empty (bucket=), skipping 7f0119f8f700 1 ====== starting new request req=0x562a2a8105f0 ===== -----Original Message----- To: Janne Johansson Cc: Marc Roos; ceph-users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: radosgw health check url Have you tried "/swift/healthcheck"? Thanks! ––––––––– Sébastien Han Senior Principal Software Engineer, Storage Architect "Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood." On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 8:58 AM Janne Johansson <icepic.dz@gmail.com> wrote:
Den sön 16 aug. 2020 kl 21:18 skrev Marc Roos
<M.Roos@f1-outsourcing.eu>:
I have just put radosgw behind haproxy, and wondered if there is a health check endpoint. If not maybe it should be
Yes, very good suggestion, both for having something where the rgw could actually state if it "feels mostly ok" in some decent fashion, and then of course so rgw can log something nice like "served health check data, 200 - ok" instead of "stupid broken connection attempt
failed".
-- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io