Re: [ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.8 QE validation status
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 7:59 AM Yuri Weinstein via ceph-users < ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
We are continuing on this release.
powercycle - FAILED Brad, approved?
Unfortunately, I don't see any logs anywhere where I have access to them so I have no way of checking this?
ceph-volume - Approved Guillaume?
Patrick was reviewing some tests, please see his comments in the same tracker. TIA
On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 1:19 AM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users < ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:31 PM Yuri Weinstein via Dev <dev@ceph.io> wrote:
This test branch was built loner then 2.5 weeks ago I have to rebuild it first and then will schedule krbd
krbd approved based on
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-10_21:26:56-krbd-reef-release-testing...
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-12_18:20:32-krbd-reef-release-testing...
Thanks,
Ilya
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:39 PM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users <
ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:50 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 5:00 PM Venky Shankar via ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> wrote:
Hi Yuri,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:34 AM Yuri Weinstein <
yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef
release
> > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > LRC upgrade - N/A > > distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > smoke - Laura approved? > > rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King approved? > (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request) > > rgw - Adam E approved? > > fs - Venky approved?
There are lot many failures in the fs suite resembling
Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: wrong fs type, bad option ...
which is an issue with the testing kernel. Adding Alex who was looking into this issue.
As far as the run validation is concerned, it's risky to ignore
wrote: point the
large number of failures. We have two options:
- fix the testing kernel issue and rerun - rerun with `for-linus` branch (with `-k for-linus` in the teuthology-suite schedule command)
The latter would be using an older kernel branch, but I think it should suffice for this case.
Hi Venky,
With your report of the fs suite being affected as well, I carved out some time to take a look.
I think it's happening because XFS maintainers disabled support for V4 filesystems that was deprecated 5 years ago -- as of 6.18 kernel it's no longer compiled in by default. The proper fix would be to create an image with/move to V5 on-disk format; I have opened [1] to try to achieve that. We can also re-enable V4 on-disk format in our kernel builds as a workaround.
This should be fixed now. Yuri, please schedule a rerun for krbd.
Thanks,
Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io
-- Cheers, Brad
participants (1)
-
Brad Hubbard